INSPIRE game: integration of vulnerability into impact-based forecasting of urban floods

Abstract. Extreme precipitation events (EPEs) and flash floods inflict great damage on lives and property in cities. Precipitation forecasts help predict extreme events; however, they have limitations in anticipating the impacts of extreme events. Impact-based forecasts (IBFs), when integrated with information on hazards, exposure, and vulnerability, can anticipate impacts and suggest emergency decisions. In this study, we present a serious game experiment, called the INSPIRE game, which evaluates the roles of hazards, exposure, and vulnerability in a flash flood situation triggered by an EPE. Participants make decisions in two rounds based on the extreme precipitation and flood that occurred over Mumbai on 26 July 2005. In the first round, participants make decisions on the forthcoming EPE scheduled for later in the afternoon. In the second round, they make decisions on the compound events of extreme precipitation, river floods, and high tide. Decisions are collected from 123 participants, predominantly researchers, PhDs and Masters students. Our results show that participant use of information to make decisions was based on the severity of the situation. A larger proportion of participants used precipitation forecast and exposure to make correct decisions in the first round, while they used precipitation forecast and vulnerability information in the second round. Higher levels of education and research experience enabled participants to evaluate the severity of the event and use the appropriate information set presented to them. Additionally, given the choice between qualitative and quantitative information on rainfall, 64 % of the participants preferred qualitative information to quantitative information. We also discuss the relevance and potential of vulnerability integration into IBFs using inferences derived from the serious game.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-947-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INSPIRE game: integration of vulnerability into impact-based forecasting of urban floods

Isabelle Ruin, Akshay Singhal, Sanjeev Jha, Louise Crochemore
1 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

INSPIRE game: integration of vulnerability into impact-based forecasting of urban floods

Isabelle Ruin, Akshay Singhal, Sanjeev Jha, Louise Crochemore
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Extreme precipitation events (EPEs) and flash floods inflict great damage on lives and property in cities. Precipitation forecasts help predict extreme events; however, they have limitations in anticipating the impacts of extreme events. Impact-based forecasts (IBFs), when integrated with information on hazards, exposure, and vulnerability, can anticipate impacts and suggest emergency decisions. In this study, we present a serious game experiment, called the INSPIRE game, which evaluates the roles of hazards, exposure, and vulnerability in a flash flood situation triggered by an EPE. Participants make decisions in two rounds based on the extreme precipitation and flood that occurred over Mumbai on 26 July 2005. In the first round, participants make decisions on the forthcoming EPE scheduled for later in the afternoon. In the second round, they make decisions on the compound events of extreme precipitation, river floods, and high tide. Decisions are collected from 123 participants, predominantly researchers, PhDs and Masters students. Our results show that participant use of information to make decisions was based on the severity of the situation. A larger proportion of participants used precipitation forecast and exposure to make correct decisions in the first round, while they used precipitation forecast and vulnerability information in the second round. Higher levels of education and research experience enabled participants to evaluate the severity of the event and use the appropriate information set presented to them. Additionally, given the choice between qualitative and quantitative information on rainfall, 64 % of the participants preferred qualitative information to quantitative information. We also discuss the relevance and potential of vulnerability integration into IBFs using inferences derived from the serious game.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(4)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal (IN), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Indian Institute of Science, Université Grenoble Alpes, Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India, Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.