Simultaneous screening of 211 pesticide residues in date fruits in Iran and health risk assessments based on Mont Carlo simulation

In this study, 211 pesticides were analyzed simultaneously using a QuEChERS method coupled with GC-MS-MS and LC-MS-MS in 90 fresh date fruit samples produced in Kerman Province. Probabilistic estimates of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation-based hazard Quotient (HQ), hazard index (HI) and carcinogenic risk (CR). The linearity of 0.015-0.30 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> with the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) values exceeding 0.9989 were achieved. The percentage of recoveries, limits of detection (LODs), limits of quantification (LOQs), Relative standard deviation (RSD %) and matrix effect (ME) were determined in the range of 77-119%, 0.001-0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> and 0.005-0.01 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, ≤ 15% and - 7.5 to 14.2%, respectively. Among 90 analyzed date fruits, 9 samples (10%) contained at least one pesticide residue, whereas 5 samples (5.5%) showed pesticide residues exceeding maximum residual limit (MRL) according to the national and European Commission. The obtained HQ values for the target pesticides were as cypermethrin > imazalil > permethrind > endosulfan > Fenpropathrin. The HI values for adult and child consumers with all pesticide residues were lower than 1. The CR was less than 1.0E-6 value. Thus, there was no carcinogenic risk to the consumers of date fruits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87638-9
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simultaneous screening of 211 pesticide residues in date fruits in Iran and health risk assessments based on Mont Carlo simulation

Moslem Basij, Mahboube Shirani, Vahideh Mahdavi, Najmeh Sheibani Tezerji
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
5.81
article

Simultaneous screening of 211 pesticide residues in date fruits in Iran and health risk assessments based on Mont Carlo simulation

Moslem Basij, Mahboube Shirani, Vahideh Mahdavi, Najmeh Sheibani Tezerji
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In this study, 211 pesticides were analyzed simultaneously using a QuEChERS method coupled with GC-MS-MS and LC-MS-MS in 90 fresh date fruit samples produced in Kerman Province. Probabilistic estimates of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation-based hazard Quotient (HQ), hazard index (HI) and carcinogenic risk (CR). The linearity of 0.015-0.30 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> with the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) values exceeding 0.9989 were achieved. The percentage of recoveries, limits of detection (LODs), limits of quantification (LOQs), Relative standard deviation (RSD %) and matrix effect (ME) were determined in the range of 77-119%, 0.001-0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> and 0.005-0.01 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, ≤ 15% and - 7.5 to 14.2%, respectively. Among 90 analyzed date fruits, 9 samples (10%) contained at least one pesticide residue, whereas 5 samples (5.5%) showed pesticide residues exceeding maximum residual limit (MRL) according to the national and European Commission. The obtained HQ values for the target pesticides were as cypermethrin > imazalil > permethrind > endosulfan > Fenpropathrin. The HI values for adult and child consumers with all pesticide residues were lower than 1. The CR was less than 1.0E-6 value. Thus, there was no carcinogenic risk to the consumers of date fruits.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Jiroft (IR), Agricultural Research & Education Organization (IR), Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
5.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.