Unlocking dynamic capabilities: Pathways for empirical research

The literature on dynamic capabilities has long faced the challenge of empirically investigating a concept that is inherently intangible, complex, and organization-specific. Empirical clarity is crucial because dynamic capabilities are argued to be essential for achieving sustainable competitive advantage in changing environments, and only empirical research can validate this claim. Despite significant advancements, issues related to measurement, methodologies, and the robustness of findings persist. This article addresses these concerns by offering key recommendations for empirical research in this domain. First, we underscore the importance of construct validity and the need for clear definitions and focused dimensions of dynamic capabilities. Second, we recommend empirical designs with time lags between the measurement of dynamic capabilities and their antecedents or outcomes, and sector-specific studies to capture the temporal dynamics and contextual nuances. Third, we encourage leveraging established survey measures, close proxies in archival research, and innovative experiments and qualitative methods. Finally, we highlight the potential of multimethod approaches to triangulate findings and enhance theoretical insight. Our hope is to help future researchers address the unique challenges of studying dynamic capabilities empirically, paving the way for continued progress in this significant field of strategic management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311251318724
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking dynamic capabilities: Pathways for empirical research

Oliver Schilke, Constance E. Helfat
10 citations
Journal of Management Scientific Reports
Innovation and Knowledge Management
22.26
article

Unlocking dynamic capabilities: Pathways for empirical research

Oliver Schilke, Constance E. Helfat
article en
10 citations

Abstract

The literature on dynamic capabilities has long faced the challenge of empirically investigating a concept that is inherently intangible, complex, and organization-specific. Empirical clarity is crucial because dynamic capabilities are argued to be essential for achieving sustainable competitive advantage in changing environments, and only empirical research can validate this claim. Despite significant advancements, issues related to measurement, methodologies, and the robustness of findings persist. This article addresses these concerns by offering key recommendations for empirical research in this domain. First, we underscore the importance of construct validity and the need for clear definitions and focused dimensions of dynamic capabilities. Second, we recommend empirical designs with time lags between the measurement of dynamic capabilities and their antecedents or outcomes, and sector-specific studies to capture the temporal dynamics and contextual nuances. Third, we encourage leveraging established survey measures, close proxies in archival research, and innovative experiments and qualitative methods. Finally, we highlight the potential of multimethod approaches to triangulate findings and enhance theoretical insight. Our hope is to help future researchers address the unique challenges of studying dynamic capabilities empirically, paving the way for continued progress in this significant field of strategic management.

Journal of Management Scientific ReportsVol. 3(2)
Dartmouth College (US), University of Arizona (US)
Division of Social and Economic Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
22.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unlocking dynamic capabilities: Pathways for empirical research — Oliver Schilke, Constance E. Helfat · Journal of Management Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS