FRAIL PARTICIPANTS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME

Purpose: Observational studies showed that frailty is common in the intensive care unit and associated with poor outcomes. However, relevant data from interventional trials are scarce, and it is unknown whether outcomes improved over time. We endeavored to estimate temporal trends of representation and outcomes of frail participants in randomized controlled trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of five ARDS Network and PETAL Network trials published between 2006 and 2019. Based on requirement for everyday assistance prior to hospitalization, we categorized participants into frail versus nonfrail. Results : Out of 3,630 participants with ARDS, 701 (19.3%) were frail. Representation of frail participants increased over time ( P = 0.001), while mortality remained stable ( P = 0.403) and as high as 39.4%. A total of 60.6% of frail participants were younger than 65 years old. Frailty was independently associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.96, P < 0.001). Frail had fewer ventilator-free days and were more likely to have subsequent disability than nonfrail participants. Conclusion: In trials of ARDS, representation of frail participants increased, while their mortality did not improve over time. The ever-increasing vulnerable group of frail participants should be taken into consideration in the design of trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shock
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000002517
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRAIL PARTICIPANTS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME

Eleni Vavouraki, Theodora K. Ntaidou, Eleni Papoutsi, Ioanna Dimopoulou et al.
1 citations
Shock
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
1.52
article

FRAIL PARTICIPANTS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME

Eleni Vavouraki, Theodora K. Ntaidou, Eleni Papoutsi, Ioanna Dimopoulou, Vassilis G. Giannakoulis, Ilias Ι. Siempos, Christina Routsi, Γεώργιος Παπαθανάκος, Αναστασία Κοτανίδου, Evangelia Theodorou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Observational studies showed that frailty is common in the intensive care unit and associated with poor outcomes. However, relevant data from interventional trials are scarce, and it is unknown whether outcomes improved over time. We endeavored to estimate temporal trends of representation and outcomes of frail participants in randomized controlled trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of five ARDS Network and PETAL Network trials published between 2006 and 2019. Based on requirement for everyday assistance prior to hospitalization, we categorized participants into frail versus nonfrail. Results : Out of 3,630 participants with ARDS, 701 (19.3%) were frail. Representation of frail participants increased over time ( P = 0.001), while mortality remained stable ( P = 0.403) and as high as 39.4%. A total of 60.6% of frail participants were younger than 65 years old. Frailty was independently associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.96, P < 0.001). Frail had fewer ventilator-free days and were more likely to have subsequent disability than nonfrail participants. Conclusion: In trials of ARDS, representation of frail participants increased, while their mortality did not improve over time. The ever-increasing vulnerable group of frail participants should be taken into consideration in the design of trials.

ShockVol. 63(3)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Cornell University (US), University Hospital of Ioannina (GR), Evangelismos Hospital (GR), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.