"It's mostly a one-way street, to be honest": the subjective relevance of public engagement in the science communication of professional university communicators

This study explores the subjective relevance and challenges of public engagement (PES) in science communication among professional university communicators based on 29 qualitative interviews in one German federal state. Despite recognizing its value, interviewees reveal significant uncertainties in understanding, objectives, and implementation of PES. They cite barriers such as reliance on scientists and control concerns. Surprisingly, social media is rarely considered for PES, with online engagement seen as difficult. This research highlights the complexities and challenges of PES in practice, emphasizing opportunities for optimized digital science communication strategies and clearer role structures between professionals and researchers to enhance PES.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Communication
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/2.24010203
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"It's mostly a one-way street, to be honest": the subjective relevance of public engagement in the science communication of professional university communicators

Monika Taddicken, Kaija Biermann, Lennart Banse
3 citations
Journal of Science Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
12.60
article

"It's mostly a one-way street, to be honest": the subjective relevance of public engagement in the science communication of professional university communicators

Monika Taddicken, Kaija Biermann, Lennart Banse
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study explores the subjective relevance and challenges of public engagement (PES) in science communication among professional university communicators based on 29 qualitative interviews in one German federal state. Despite recognizing its value, interviewees reveal significant uncertainties in understanding, objectives, and implementation of PES. They cite barriers such as reliance on scientists and control concerns. Surprisingly, social media is rarely considered for PES, with online engagement seen as difficult. This research highlights the complexities and challenges of PES in practice, emphasizing opportunities for optimized digital science communication strategies and clearer role structures between professionals and researchers to enhance PES.

Journal of Science CommunicationVol. 24(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.