Authoritarian Securitisation and Moral Panic: The Discourse and Role of the Senate in the 2023 Thai Election

In Thailand's 2023 election, an appointed Senate controlled who became prime minister. To better understand the thinking of key actors in this critical moment, this paper examines the discourse of senators who publicly commented prior to the 13 July joint sitting of the Thai parliament, where election-winning candidate Pita Limcharoenrat was blocked. This paper argues that the two predominant narratives justifying the veto, protecting Thailand's lèse-majesté law and guarding against chaos and conflict, can be analysed in four dimensions: affective, strategic, coordinative and communicative. Affectively, the narratives reflected moral panic in relation to the youth-led change in attitudes towards the monarchy. Strategically, the narratives protected elite interests via securitisation, in which a state of severe threat is invoked and used to justify extreme policies. Coordinatively, the narratives signalled to elites the costs of transgression and communicatively, they conveyed to broader Thai society the potential for conservative-sponsored street protest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251320658
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authoritarian Securitisation and Moral Panic: The Discourse and Role of the Senate in the 2023 Thai Election

Gregory V. Raymond
1 citations
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
8.52
article

Authoritarian Securitisation and Moral Panic: The Discourse and Role of the Senate in the 2023 Thai Election

Gregory V. Raymond
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In Thailand's 2023 election, an appointed Senate controlled who became prime minister. To better understand the thinking of key actors in this critical moment, this paper examines the discourse of senators who publicly commented prior to the 13 July joint sitting of the Thai parliament, where election-winning candidate Pita Limcharoenrat was blocked. This paper argues that the two predominant narratives justifying the veto, protecting Thailand's lèse-majesté law and guarding against chaos and conflict, can be analysed in four dimensions: affective, strategic, coordinative and communicative. Affectively, the narratives reflected moral panic in relation to the youth-led change in attitudes towards the monarchy. Strategically, the narratives protected elite interests via securitisation, in which a state of severe threat is invoked and used to justify extreme policies. Coordinatively, the narratives signalled to elites the costs of transgression and communicatively, they conveyed to broader Thai society the potential for conservative-sponsored street protest.

Journal of Current Southeast Asian AffairsVol. 44(2)
Australian National University (AU), New Generation University College (ET), National University College (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.