Comparison between Spodoptera frugiperda and Spodoptera littoralis: Insecticide Resistance, Detoxifying Enzymes and Protein Patterns

In 2019, researchers first discovered the highly invasive nocturnal pest Spodoptera frugiperda in Upper Egypt. This work investigated the sensitivity of S. frugiperda to six commercial pesticides in Egypt compared to Spodoptera littoralis and detected some biochemical changes (Detoxifying enzyme activities and protein patterns) in treated larvae of both insects. The results indicated that S. frugiperda was more sensitive to Spinosad (LC50 = 6.23 ppm) and Abamectin (LC50 = 27.75 ppm) than S. littoralis (LC50 = 22 and 30 ppm, respectively). However, S. frugiperda was more resistant to Tebufenozid (LC50 = 283.06 ppm) and Thiamethoxam (LC50 = 269.4 ppm) than S. littoralis (LC50 = 64.2 and 41.97 ppm, respectively). In addition, in comparison with S. littoralis, S. frugiperda was less sensitive to Alpha-Cypermethrin (LC50 = 53.05 ppm) and Indoxacarb (LC50 = 10.85 ppm), whereas S. littoralis was more sensitive to both pesticides (LC50 = 5.02 and 4.02 ppm, respectively). The data of detoxifying enzyme (AST, ALT, ACP, ALP, and GST) activities indicated that the evaluated pesticides led to different extents of inhibition or activation of estimated detoxifying enzymes in both insect species. The different degrees in the detoxifying enzyme activities may be the causes of the variations of the insect sensitivity or resistance to the tested pesticides. The SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that there were variations in the protein patterns among S. littoralis and S. frugiperda when treated by tested pesticides. Thus, this study recommended that Spinosad, Indoxacarb, and Abamectin could be used to control S. frugiperda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/jppp.2025.349384.1296
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect Resistance and Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between Spodoptera frugiperda and Spodoptera littoralis: Insecticide Resistance, Detoxifying Enzymes and Protein Patterns

Noha A. Sukar, Rosmawati Abdullah
1 citations
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
Insect Resistance and Genetics
0.81
article

Comparison between Spodoptera frugiperda and Spodoptera littoralis: Insecticide Resistance, Detoxifying Enzymes and Protein Patterns

Noha A. Sukar, Rosmawati Abdullah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 2019, researchers first discovered the highly invasive nocturnal pest Spodoptera frugiperda in Upper Egypt. This work investigated the sensitivity of S. frugiperda to six commercial pesticides in Egypt compared to Spodoptera littoralis and detected some biochemical changes (Detoxifying enzyme activities and protein patterns) in treated larvae of both insects. The results indicated that S. frugiperda was more sensitive to Spinosad (LC50 = 6.23 ppm) and Abamectin (LC50 = 27.75 ppm) than S. littoralis (LC50 = 22 and 30 ppm, respectively). However, S. frugiperda was more resistant to Tebufenozid (LC50 = 283.06 ppm) and Thiamethoxam (LC50 = 269.4 ppm) than S. littoralis (LC50 = 64.2 and 41.97 ppm, respectively). In addition, in comparison with S. littoralis, S. frugiperda was less sensitive to Alpha-Cypermethrin (LC50 = 53.05 ppm) and Indoxacarb (LC50 = 10.85 ppm), whereas S. littoralis was more sensitive to both pesticides (LC50 = 5.02 and 4.02 ppm, respectively). The data of detoxifying enzyme (AST, ALT, ACP, ALP, and GST) activities indicated that the evaluated pesticides led to different extents of inhibition or activation of estimated detoxifying enzymes in both insect species. The different degrees in the detoxifying enzyme activities may be the causes of the variations of the insect sensitivity or resistance to the tested pesticides. The SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that there were variations in the protein patterns among S. littoralis and S. frugiperda when treated by tested pesticides. Thus, this study recommended that Spinosad, Indoxacarb, and Abamectin could be used to control S. frugiperda.

Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and PathologyVol. 0(0)
Agricultural Research Center (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Insect Resistance and Genetics
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.