Left bundle branch pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy <i>vs</i> biventricular pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy–time to write a requiem for biventricular pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with left bundle branch (LBB) block. Biventricular pacing (BVP) is considered the gold standard for achieving CRT; however, approximately 30%-40% of patients do not respond to BVP-CRT. Recent studies have demonstrated that LBB pacing (LBBP) produces remarkable results in CRT. In this meta-analysis, LBBP-CRT showed better outcomes than conventional BVP-CRT, including greater QRS duration reduction and left ventricular ejection fraction improvement, along with consistently lower pacing thresholds on follow-up. Additionally, there was a greater reduction in New York Heart Association class and brain natriuretic peptide levels. This study contributes to the growing body of encouraging data on LBBP-CRT from recent years. With ongoing technological advancements and increasing operator expertise, the day may not be far when LBBP-CRT becomes the standard of care rather than the exception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Cardiology
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i2.103356
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left bundle branch pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy vs biventricular pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy–time to write a requiem for biventricular pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy

Monika Bhandari, Daljeet Kaur Saggu, Akshyaya Kumar Pradhan
World Journal of Cardiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Left bundle branch pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy vs biventricular pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy–time to write a requiem for biventricular pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy

Monika Bhandari, Daljeet Kaur Saggu, Akshyaya Kumar Pradhan
article en

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with left bundle branch (LBB) block. Biventricular pacing (BVP) is considered the gold standard for achieving CRT; however, approximately 30%-40% of patients do not respond to BVP-CRT. Recent studies have demonstrated that LBB pacing (LBBP) produces remarkable results in CRT. In this meta-analysis, LBBP-CRT showed better outcomes than conventional BVP-CRT, including greater QRS duration reduction and left ventricular ejection fraction improvement, along with consistently lower pacing thresholds on follow-up. Additionally, there was a greater reduction in New York Heart Association class and brain natriuretic peptide levels. This study contributes to the growing body of encouraging data on LBBP-CRT from recent years. With ongoing technological advancements and increasing operator expertise, the day may not be far when LBBP-CRT becomes the standard of care rather than the exception.

World Journal of CardiologyVol. 17(2)
King George's Medical University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.