Leveling up: Treating Uptake as Endogenous May Increase the Value of Screening Programs

BackgroundWe aimed to illustrate that health economists should consider individual heterogeneity when solving the problem of finding the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity that maximizes the average health utility of a target population in a screening program.MethodsA theoretical framework compares the solution under standard economics of diagnoses to the optimal combination under an endogenous uptake analysis, where screening participation is given by heterogenous health preferences. An applied example used calibrated parameters with real data from the bowel cancer screening program in the United Kingdom. Scenario analyses show how the results would change with parameter values, if disease risk and health utilities were not independent and if screening uptake were not completely determined by health preferences.ResultsA general theoretical result states that the endogenous uptake analysis leads to a weakly higher true- and false-positive rate than would be optimal under the standard approach. In the same way, the endogenous solution would lead to a lower uptake rate. The base-case scenario of the applied example illustrates that a screening program using the endogenous solution would generate 21.1% more quality-adjusted life-years than when using the standard solution. The scenario analyses show when the endogenous analysis is most valued and that the general result applies for a wide range of situations when theoretical assumptions are relaxed.LimitationsThe results obtained are valid under the assumptions made. Analysts should evaluate if those could hold in the applied screening context.ConclusionsIndividual heterogeneity and uptake decisions are relevant factors to consider in the problem of finding an optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for a screening test.HighlightsThe value of screening programs can be higher if heterogeneity of preferences in the target population is considered.The optimal operation of a screening test depends on health utilities of the target population and on the heterogeneity of these health utilities.Under heterogeneity of health utilities, the optimal operation of a screening test does not maximize screening uptake.A general theoretical result states that the endogenous uptake analysis leads to a weakly higher true- and false-positive rate than would be optimal under a standard approach; this is true for a wide range of situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Decision Making
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x251319794
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveling up: Treating Uptake as Endogenous May Increase the Value of Screening Programs

Neil Hawkins, José Antonio Robles‐Zurita, Janet Bouttell
Medical Decision Making
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Leveling up: Treating Uptake as Endogenous May Increase the Value of Screening Programs

Neil Hawkins, José Antonio Robles‐Zurita, Janet Bouttell
article en

Abstract

BackgroundWe aimed to illustrate that health economists should consider individual heterogeneity when solving the problem of finding the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity that maximizes the average health utility of a target population in a screening program.MethodsA theoretical framework compares the solution under standard economics of diagnoses to the optimal combination under an endogenous uptake analysis, where screening participation is given by heterogenous health preferences. An applied example used calibrated parameters with real data from the bowel cancer screening program in the United Kingdom. Scenario analyses show how the results would change with parameter values, if disease risk and health utilities were not independent and if screening uptake were not completely determined by health preferences.ResultsA general theoretical result states that the endogenous uptake analysis leads to a weakly higher true- and false-positive rate than would be optimal under the standard approach. In the same way, the endogenous solution would lead to a lower uptake rate. The base-case scenario of the applied example illustrates that a screening program using the endogenous solution would generate 21.1% more quality-adjusted life-years than when using the standard solution. The scenario analyses show when the endogenous analysis is most valued and that the general result applies for a wide range of situations when theoretical assumptions are relaxed.LimitationsThe results obtained are valid under the assumptions made. Analysts should evaluate if those could hold in the applied screening context.ConclusionsIndividual heterogeneity and uptake decisions are relevant factors to consider in the problem of finding an optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for a screening test.HighlightsThe value of screening programs can be higher if heterogeneity of preferences in the target population is considered.The optimal operation of a screening test depends on health utilities of the target population and on the heterogeneity of these health utilities.Under heterogeneity of health utilities, the optimal operation of a screening test does not maximize screening uptake.A general theoretical result states that the endogenous uptake analysis leads to a weakly higher true- and false-positive rate than would be optimal under a standard approach; this is true for a wide range of situations.

Medical Decision MakingVol. 45(3)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.