The Factor Structure of Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory-Arabic Version

The Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) has been culturally adapted and translated for use with populations worldwide. This study aimed to (a) test the hypothesis of the unidimensionality of the Arabic KIDI, (b) report its internal consistency, and (c) compare the differences between participants’ means and variances on the latent variable, parental knowledge of child development. Two groups of participants (n = 2,195) completed the KIDI: mothers of typically developing children (Group1 , n1 = 1,369) and children with disabilities (Group2, n2 = 826). The results showed that the Arabic KIDI had a unidimensional factor structure (i.e., parental knowledge) in the two groups, with a higher single-factor model (i.e., governorates of residence). The results of the two-level factor model were associated with tenable goodness-of-fit indices. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was adequate in each group: Group1: 𝛼 =.79, with a 95% confidence interval of [.77,.80], and Group2: 𝛼 = .85, with a 95% confidence interval of [.83,.87]. In addition, Group1 had a higher mean than Group2 on the studied underlying dimension, while Group1 had a significantly lower variance than Group2. The study findings implied that parental knowledge may differ due to children's disability status and place of residency. Additionally, the findings highlighted the possibility of assessing overall parental knowledge with the Arabic KIDI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejes.2024.413506
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Infant Development and Preterm Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Factor Structure of Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory-Arabic Version

Khaled Alkherainej
1 citations
Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences
Infant Development and Preterm Care
1.11
article

The Factor Structure of Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory-Arabic Version

Khaled Alkherainej
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) has been culturally adapted and translated for use with populations worldwide. This study aimed to (a) test the hypothesis of the unidimensionality of the Arabic KIDI, (b) report its internal consistency, and (c) compare the differences between participants’ means and variances on the latent variable, parental knowledge of child development. Two groups of participants (n = 2,195) completed the KIDI: mothers of typically developing children (Group1 , n1 = 1,369) and children with disabilities (Group2, n2 = 826). The results showed that the Arabic KIDI had a unidimensional factor structure (i.e., parental knowledge) in the two groups, with a higher single-factor model (i.e., governorates of residence). The results of the two-level factor model were associated with tenable goodness-of-fit indices. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was adequate in each group: Group1: 𝛼 =.79, with a 95% confidence interval of [.77,.80], and Group2: 𝛼 = .85, with a 95% confidence interval of [.83,.87]. In addition, Group1 had a higher mean than Group2 on the studied underlying dimension, while Group1 had a significantly lower variance than Group2. The study findings implied that parental knowledge may differ due to children's disability status and place of residency. Additionally, the findings highlighted the possibility of assessing overall parental knowledge with the Arabic KIDI.

Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Educational SciencesVol. 4(2)
Portland State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Infant Development and Preterm Care
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.