Blends and Mental Models in the Time of the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of English Multimodal Op-Eds

The Covid-19 pandemic has affected not only the health of people but also their daily social practices and interactions, especially on electronic media platforms and news agencies. This paper aims to investigate British and American multimodal Op-Ed articles (opposite-editorials) on the Covid-19 pandemic from a sociocognitive perspective, find out where multimodal blends come from, find out to what extent the writer and the illustrator complement each other in order to co-shape the message of Op-Ed discourse, investigate the role of knowledge in Op-Ed articles, illustrate to what extent multimodal Op-Ed articles manage the relationship between presupposed and new knowledge, and investigate the similarities and the differences between British and American Op-Eds. A corpus of 24 multimodal Op-Ed articles is collected from British and American digital newspaper archives The Guardian and The New York Times, respectively. The selected data are analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Abdel Raheem’s integrative model (2021a) is adopted to analyse the selected multimodal Op-Ed articles. It combines Conceptual Bending Theory (Fauconnier and Turner, 2002) and Mental Model Theory (van Dijk, 2014, 2023). The paper discusses cross-cultural similarities and differences in blending use and presents the crucial role of knowledge in Covid-19 Op-Ed articles production and understanding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies /Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejels.2024.413610
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blends and Mental Models in the Time of the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of English Multimodal Op-Eds

Samar Osman
Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies /Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Blends and Mental Models in the Time of the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of English Multimodal Op-Eds

Samar Osman
article en

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has affected not only the health of people but also their daily social practices and interactions, especially on electronic media platforms and news agencies. This paper aims to investigate British and American multimodal Op-Ed articles (opposite-editorials) on the Covid-19 pandemic from a sociocognitive perspective, find out where multimodal blends come from, find out to what extent the writer and the illustrator complement each other in order to co-shape the message of Op-Ed discourse, investigate the role of knowledge in Op-Ed articles, illustrate to what extent multimodal Op-Ed articles manage the relationship between presupposed and new knowledge, and investigate the similarities and the differences between British and American Op-Eds. A corpus of 24 multimodal Op-Ed articles is collected from British and American digital newspaper archives The Guardian and The New York Times, respectively. The selected data are analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Abdel Raheem’s integrative model (2021a) is adopted to analyse the selected multimodal Op-Ed articles. It combines Conceptual Bending Theory (Fauconnier and Turner, 2002) and Mental Model Theory (van Dijk, 2014, 2023). The paper discusses cross-cultural similarities and differences in blending use and presents the crucial role of knowledge in Covid-19 Op-Ed articles production and understanding.

Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies /Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature StudiesVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.