La deriva antiscientifica e autoritaria negli USA e le sue implicazioni per la salute globale

The article addresses the alarming antiscientific and authoritarian drift in the United States and highlights its consequences on public health and scientific research. It notes the government's withdrawal from international agreements, the censorship of critical terms in fed- eral documents and the elimination of essential health data, all factors that threaten the integrity of scientific inquiry. There are also concerns about possible reprisals against those who oppose these practices. The removal of data concerning marginalized groups is described as a ‘digital genocide’, as it erases crucial information needed to address health disparities. The article and the comment warn that the erosion of evidence-based principles and the stop to national and global health programmes will lead a sharp increase in pre- ventable deaths, especially among children and vulnerable populations. There is the need for a strong response from the scientific community to defend the values of scientific freedom, equity and right to health for all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medico e Bambino
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53126/meb44111
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Educational and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La deriva antiscientifica e autoritaria negli USA e le sue implicazioni per la salute globale

Giorgio Tamburlini, Federico Marchetti
3 citations
Medico e Bambino
Educational and Social Studies
26.78
article

La deriva antiscientifica e autoritaria negli USA e le sue implicazioni per la salute globale

Giorgio Tamburlini, Federico Marchetti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The article addresses the alarming antiscientific and authoritarian drift in the United States and highlights its consequences on public health and scientific research. It notes the government's withdrawal from international agreements, the censorship of critical terms in fed- eral documents and the elimination of essential health data, all factors that threaten the integrity of scientific inquiry. There are also concerns about possible reprisals against those who oppose these practices. The removal of data concerning marginalized groups is described as a ‘digital genocide’, as it erases crucial information needed to address health disparities. The article and the comment warn that the erosion of evidence-based principles and the stop to national and global health programmes will lead a sharp increase in pre- ventable deaths, especially among children and vulnerable populations. There is the need for a strong response from the scientific community to defend the values of scientific freedom, equity and right to health for all.

Medico e BambinoVol. 44(02)
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Educational and Social Studies
26.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.