Controversies and scandals as an RRI teaching and learning tool: beyond inspiring

The transition from undergraduate to PhD student in STEM disciplines is a key point for introducing RRI, as we see a natural increase in responsibility and a shift to active research. In this study, one lecturer and eleven STEM PhD students reflect on our experiences of learning about RRI and explore how controversies and scandals can be used for teaching, through reflective essays and discussions of nine controversies and scandals. Thematic analysis was used to highlight key challenges in learning about RRI in our context, map the case studies against an RRI framework, and identify four ways to view RRI when learning as a PhD student in STEM: (1) starting point, (2) developing research identity, (3) communities of research and innovation, and (4) bigger picture. We suggest there are rich learning opportunities within studying such cases that go beyond the obvious ‘inspiring and eliciting interest’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2025.2464359
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Controversies and scandals as an RRI teaching and learning tool: beyond inspiring

Robert A. Weller, Amy Morgan, Alison G. Harvey, Tom Whalley et al.
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Controversies and scandals as an RRI teaching and learning tool: beyond inspiring

Robert A. Weller, Amy Morgan, Alison G. Harvey, Tom Whalley, Ayesha Patel, Ioana Albu, Caitlin E. Jackson, Catherine E. W. Pennington, Rachel Furmidge, Rebecca Downs-Ford, Keir Nathan, Yasmine Osmani
article en

Abstract

The transition from undergraduate to PhD student in STEM disciplines is a key point for introducing RRI, as we see a natural increase in responsibility and a shift to active research. In this study, one lecturer and eleven STEM PhD students reflect on our experiences of learning about RRI and explore how controversies and scandals can be used for teaching, through reflective essays and discussions of nine controversies and scandals. Thematic analysis was used to highlight key challenges in learning about RRI in our context, map the case studies against an RRI framework, and identify four ways to view RRI when learning as a PhD student in STEM: (1) starting point, (2) developing research identity, (3) communities of research and innovation, and (4) bigger picture. We suggest there are rich learning opportunities within studying such cases that go beyond the obvious ‘inspiring and eliciting interest’.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 12(1)
University of Manchester (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Controversies and scandals as an RRI teaching and learning tool: beyond inspiring — Robert A. Weller, Amy Morgan, et al. · Journal of Responsible Innovation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS