All Good Things Come to an End: Emerging Strategic Patterns of Sunset Foundations

ABSTRACT Sunset foundations—foundations that exist for a limited time—are gaining increased attention in the discussion on impactful philanthropy. The idea is that having a limited organizational life span allows for greater impact. However, there is little knowledge on how leaders of these foundations navigate this sunset phase. Based on organizational development theory, we take a first step in investigating the causes that lead to the decision to sunset. We apply a multiple‐case study approach to analyze an international sample of 11 sunset foundations. We find that depending on the cause for the decision to close as well as the logic through which the remaining endowment is spent down, four distinct ideal‐typical sunset strategies emerge. The proposed strategic patterns refer to as Impact Accelerators, Urgency Responders, Resource Spenders, and Fade‐outs. This classification adds to a better understanding of the strategic and managerial requirements leaders of sunset foundations should consider and the intended impact goals connected to a sunset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philanthropy
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All Good Things Come to an End: Emerging Strategic Patterns of Sunset Foundations

Georg von Schnurbein, Alice Hengevoss
1 citations
Journal of Philanthropy
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
4.20
article

All Good Things Come to an End: Emerging Strategic Patterns of Sunset Foundations

Georg von Schnurbein, Alice Hengevoss
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sunset foundations—foundations that exist for a limited time—are gaining increased attention in the discussion on impactful philanthropy. The idea is that having a limited organizational life span allows for greater impact. However, there is little knowledge on how leaders of these foundations navigate this sunset phase. Based on organizational development theory, we take a first step in investigating the causes that lead to the decision to sunset. We apply a multiple‐case study approach to analyze an international sample of 11 sunset foundations. We find that depending on the cause for the decision to close as well as the logic through which the remaining endowment is spent down, four distinct ideal‐typical sunset strategies emerge. The proposed strategic patterns refer to as Impact Accelerators, Urgency Responders, Resource Spenders, and Fade‐outs. This classification adds to a better understanding of the strategic and managerial requirements leaders of sunset foundations should consider and the intended impact goals connected to a sunset.

Journal of PhilanthropyVol. 30(1)
University of Basel (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.