Probabilistic consequence relations

Abstract This paper investigates logical consequence defined in terms of probability distributions, for a classical propositional language using a standard notion of probability. We examine three distinct probabilistic consequence notions, which we call material consequence, preservation consequence and symmetric consequence. While material consequence is fully classical for any threshold, preservation consequence and symmetric consequence are subclassical, with only symmetric consequence gradually approaching classical logic at the limit threshold equal to 1. Our results extend earlier results obtained by J. Paris in a $\text{Set-Fmla}$ setting to the Set-Set setting, and consider open thresholds beside closed ones. In the Set-Set setting, in particular, they reveal that probability 1 preservation does not yield classical logic, but supervaluationism, and conversely positive probability preservation yields subvaluationism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Logic and Computation
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exae076
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic consequence relations

Paul Égré, Ellie Ripley
Journal of Logic and Computation
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

Probabilistic consequence relations

Paul Égré, Ellie Ripley
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates logical consequence defined in terms of probability distributions, for a classical propositional language using a standard notion of probability. We examine three distinct probabilistic consequence notions, which we call material consequence, preservation consequence and symmetric consequence. While material consequence is fully classical for any threshold, preservation consequence and symmetric consequence are subclassical, with only symmetric consequence gradually approaching classical logic at the limit threshold equal to 1. Our results extend earlier results obtained by J. Paris in a $\text{Set-Fmla}$ setting to the Set-Set setting, and consider open thresholds beside closed ones. In the Set-Set setting, in particular, they reveal that probability 1 preservation does not yield classical logic, but supervaluationism, and conversely positive probability preservation yields subvaluationism.

Journal of Logic and ComputationVol. 35(8)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Monash University (AU)
École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Monash University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Probabilistic consequence relations — Paul Égré, Ellie Ripley · Journal of Logic and Computation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS