Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Phantoms Using Impact Analysis

Skin physiopathological conditions have a strong influence on its biomechanical properties. However, it remains difficult to accurately assess the surface stiffness of soft tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of an impact-based analysis method (IBAM) and to compare them with those of an existing digital palpation device, MyotonPro<sup>®</sup>. The IBAM is based on the impact of an instrumented hammer equipped with a force sensor on a cylindrical punch in contact with agar-based phantoms mimicking soft tissues. The indicator Δt is estimated by analyzing the force signal obtained from the instrumented hammer. Various phantom geometries, stiffnesses and structures (homogeneous and bilayer) were used to estimate the performances of both methods. Measurements show that the IBAM is sensitive to a volume of interest equivalent to a sphere approximately twice the punch diameter. The sensitivity of the IBAM to changes in Young's modulus is similar to that of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and significantly better compared to MyotonPro. The axial (respectively, lateral) resolution is two (respectively, five) times lower with the IBAM than with MyotonPro. The present study paves the way for the development of a simple, quantitative and non-invasive method to measure skin biomechanical properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051344
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Phantoms Using Impact Analysis

Guillaume Haïat, Giuseppe Rosi, Anne-Sophie Poudrel, Arthur Bouffandeau et al.
5 citations
Sensors
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
6.80
article

Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Phantoms Using Impact Analysis

Guillaume Haïat, Giuseppe Rosi, Anne-Sophie Poudrel, Arthur Bouffandeau, Jean‐Paul Meningaud, Vu‐Hieu Nguyen, Charles-Henri Flouzat–Lachaniette, Chloé Brossier
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Skin physiopathological conditions have a strong influence on its biomechanical properties. However, it remains difficult to accurately assess the surface stiffness of soft tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of an impact-based analysis method (IBAM) and to compare them with those of an existing digital palpation device, MyotonPro<sup>®</sup>. The IBAM is based on the impact of an instrumented hammer equipped with a force sensor on a cylindrical punch in contact with agar-based phantoms mimicking soft tissues. The indicator Δt is estimated by analyzing the force signal obtained from the instrumented hammer. Various phantom geometries, stiffnesses and structures (homogeneous and bilayer) were used to estimate the performances of both methods. Measurements show that the IBAM is sensitive to a volume of interest equivalent to a sphere approximately twice the punch diameter. The sensitivity of the IBAM to changes in Young's modulus is similar to that of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and significantly better compared to MyotonPro. The axial (respectively, lateral) resolution is two (respectively, five) times lower with the IBAM than with MyotonPro. The present study paves the way for the development of a simple, quantitative and non-invasive method to measure skin biomechanical properties.

SensorsVol. 25(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (FR), Laboratoire Modélisation et Simulation Multi-Echelle (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
6.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.