Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy for Relapsed and Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma

<b>Introduction:</b> While palliative radiotherapy (RT) is frequently used in the management of relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL); outcomes after palliative hypofractionated RT (hypo-RT) remain poorly characterized. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 38 patients who were diagnosed with HR-NBL between 1997 and 2021 and received palliative RT. Conventional RT (conv-RT) and hypo-RT were defined as palliative treatment courses using dose ≤2 or >2 Gy per fraction, respectively. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-field progression using Gray's test. Univariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. <b>Results</b>: When analyzing by first course of palliative RT, 16 patients received conventionally fractionated RT (43%) and 21 received hypo-RT (57%). Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range: 0.3-104.0), the cumulative incidence of in-field progression was not statistically significantly different between hypo-RT and conv-RT (30% vs. 20% at 10 months; <i>p</i> = 0.80). Clinical response, defined as symptomatic improvement or decrease in the size of the lesion, was not statistically different between the two groups (92% conv-RT vs. 90% hypo-RT; <i>p</i> = 1.00). No grade ≥4 toxicities were observed. On univariate analysis, hypo-RT (HR 1.50; 95% CI 0.47-4.76; <i>p</i> = 0.493) was not statistically significantly associated with time to in-field progression, but <i>MYCN</i> amplification was associated with significantly longer time to in-field progression (HR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05-0.77; <i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions</b>: We found no statistically significant difference in cumulative incidence of in-field progression and clinical outcomes between the conv-RT and hypo-RT groups. Palliative hypo-RT can be considered for relapsed/refractory HR-NBL, especially when shorter treatments may offer improved quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030124
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy for Relapsed and Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Steven G. DuBois, Kevin X. Liu, Karen Jean Marcus, Shannon M. MacDonald et al.
1 citations
Current Oncology
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
1.39
article

Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy for Relapsed and Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Steven G. DuBois, Kevin X. Liu, Karen Jean Marcus, Shannon M. MacDonald, Paul J. Catalano, Suzanne Shusterman, Myrsini Ioakeim‐Ioannidou, Daphne Adele Haas-Kogan, Hesham M. Elhalawani, Ellery Koelker-Wolfe, Torunn I Yock
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> While palliative radiotherapy (RT) is frequently used in the management of relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL); outcomes after palliative hypofractionated RT (hypo-RT) remain poorly characterized. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 38 patients who were diagnosed with HR-NBL between 1997 and 2021 and received palliative RT. Conventional RT (conv-RT) and hypo-RT were defined as palliative treatment courses using dose ≤2 or >2 Gy per fraction, respectively. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-field progression using Gray's test. Univariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. <b>Results</b>: When analyzing by first course of palliative RT, 16 patients received conventionally fractionated RT (43%) and 21 received hypo-RT (57%). Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range: 0.3-104.0), the cumulative incidence of in-field progression was not statistically significantly different between hypo-RT and conv-RT (30% vs. 20% at 10 months; <i>p</i> = 0.80). Clinical response, defined as symptomatic improvement or decrease in the size of the lesion, was not statistically different between the two groups (92% conv-RT vs. 90% hypo-RT; <i>p</i> = 1.00). No grade ≥4 toxicities were observed. On univariate analysis, hypo-RT (HR 1.50; 95% CI 0.47-4.76; <i>p</i> = 0.493) was not statistically significantly associated with time to in-field progression, but <i>MYCN</i> amplification was associated with significantly longer time to in-field progression (HR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05-0.77; <i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions</b>: We found no statistically significant difference in cumulative incidence of in-field progression and clinical outcomes between the conv-RT and hypo-RT groups. Palliative hypo-RT can be considered for relapsed/refractory HR-NBL, especially when shorter treatments may offer improved quality of life.

Current OncologyVol. 32(3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.