Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy for Relapsed and Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma
<b>Introduction:</b> While palliative radiotherapy (RT) is frequently used in the management of relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL); outcomes after palliative hypofractionated RT (hypo-RT) remain poorly characterized. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 38 patients who were diagnosed with HR-NBL between 1997 and 2021 and received palliative RT. Conventional RT (conv-RT) and hypo-RT were defined as palliative treatment courses using dose ≤2 or >2 Gy per fraction, respectively. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-field progression using Gray's test. Univariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. <b>Results</b>: When analyzing by first course of palliative RT, 16 patients received conventionally fractionated RT (43%) and 21 received hypo-RT (57%). Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range: 0.3-104.0), the cumulative incidence of in-field progression was not statistically significantly different between hypo-RT and conv-RT (30% vs. 20% at 10 months; <i>p</i> = 0.80). Clinical response, defined as symptomatic improvement or decrease in the size of the lesion, was not statistically different between the two groups (92% conv-RT vs. 90% hypo-RT; <i>p</i> = 1.00). No grade ≥4 toxicities were observed. On univariate analysis, hypo-RT (HR 1.50; 95% CI 0.47-4.76; <i>p</i> = 0.493) was not statistically significantly associated with time to in-field progression, but <i>MYCN</i> amplification was associated with significantly longer time to in-field progression (HR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05-0.77; <i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions</b>: We found no statistically significant difference in cumulative incidence of in-field progression and clinical outcomes between the conv-RT and hypo-RT groups. Palliative hypo-RT can be considered for relapsed/refractory HR-NBL, especially when shorter treatments may offer improved quality of life.
Authors
- Steven G. DuBois (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-738X)
- Kevin X. Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-5137)
- Karen Jean Marcus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-6336)
- Shannon M. MacDonald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-1337)
- Paul J. Catalano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1105-8852)
- Suzanne Shusterman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5988-1792)
- Myrsini Ioakeim‐Ioannidou
- Daphne Adele Haas-Kogan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2378-4800)
- Hesham M. Elhalawani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-2623)
- Ellery Koelker-Wolfe
- Torunn I Yock
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Current Oncology
- Published
- 2025-02-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030124
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.39