Applying the FAIR Principles to computational workflows

Recent trends within computational and data sciences show an increasing recognition and adoption of computational workflows as tools for productivity and reproducibility that also democratize access to platforms and processing know-how. As digital objects to be shared, discovered, and reused, computational workflows benefit from the FAIR principles, which stand for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. The Workflows Community Initiative’s FAIR Workflows Working Group (WCI-FW), a global and open community of researchers and developers working with computational workflows across disciplines and domains, has systematically addressed the application of both FAIR data and software principles to computational workflows. We present recommendations with commentary that reflects our discussions and justifies our choices and adaptations. These are offered to workflow users and authors, workflow management system developers, and providers of workflow services as guidelines for adoption and fodder for discussion. The FAIR recommendations for workflows that we propose in this paper will maximize their value as research assets and facilitate their adoption by the wider community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04451-9
Citations
35
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
145.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying the FAIR Principles to computational workflows

Sehrish Kanwal, Johannes Köster, Ziheng Sun, Michael R. Crusoe et al.
35 citations
Scientific Data
Scientific Computing and Data Management
145.91
article

Applying the FAIR Principles to computational workflows

Sehrish Kanwal, Johannes Köster, Ziheng Sun, Michael R. Crusoe, Shoaib Sufi, Carole Goble, Stian Soiland‐Reyes, Daniel Garijo, Sean R. Wilkinson, Nicola Soranzo, Khalid Belhajjame, Farah Zaib Khan, Line Pouchard, Merridee A. Wouters, Nick Juty, Karsten Peters, Bruno P. Kinoshita, Denis Yuen, Baiba Vilne, Luiz Gadelha, Ove Gustafsson, Randy K. Rannow, Meznah Aloqalaa
article en
35 citations

Abstract

Recent trends within computational and data sciences show an increasing recognition and adoption of computational workflows as tools for productivity and reproducibility that also democratize access to platforms and processing know-how. As digital objects to be shared, discovered, and reused, computational workflows benefit from the FAIR principles, which stand for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. The Workflows Community Initiative’s FAIR Workflows Working Group (WCI-FW), a global and open community of researchers and developers working with computational workflows across disciplines and domains, has systematically addressed the application of both FAIR data and software principles to computational workflows. We present recommendations with commentary that reflects our discussions and justifies our choices and adaptations. These are offered to workflow users and authors, workflow management system developers, and providers of workflow services as guidelines for adoption and fodder for discussion. The FAIR recommendations for workflows that we propose in this paper will maximize their value as research assets and facilitate their adoption by the wider community.

Scientific DataVol. 12(1)
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), George Mason University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Zuse Institute Berlin (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES), German Climate Computing Centre (DE), University of Manchester (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Earlham Institute (GB), Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (AU), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES), University of Amsterdam (NL), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
145.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.