A preliminary investigation into the potential, pitfalls, and limitations of large language models for mammography interpretation

This study evaluates the capabilities of large language models, specifically GPT-4, in interpreting mammographic images. The analysis involved 120 mammographic images equally divided between cases with and without mammography's findings. Without additional context, the LLM was tasked to generate reports based solely on these images. GPT-4 correctly identified mammographic projections in 53.3% of cases and showed varying degrees of accuracy in identifying microcalcifications and masses. The study highlighted GPT-4's embryonic interpretative abilities with a sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 37.5%. However, a significant rate of false positives and false negatives, along with hallucinations, underscored the model's limitations. This exploratory test offers insights into the potential and risks of using LLMs in mammography interpretation, also underscoring the need for dedicated training, validation, and regulation of AI tools in healthcare to ensure their reliability and safety in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Oncology
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-02005-4
Citations
7
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A preliminary investigation into the potential, pitfalls, and limitations of large language models for mammography interpretation

Chiara Trentin, Enrico Cassano, Anna Rotili, Filippo Pesapane et al.
7 citations
Discover Oncology
AI in cancer detection
17.37
article

A preliminary investigation into the potential, pitfalls, and limitations of large language models for mammography interpretation

Chiara Trentin, Enrico Cassano, Anna Rotili, Filippo Pesapane, Silvia Penco, Luca Nicosia, Valeria Dominelli, Giulia Signorelli, Serena Carriero, Federica Ferrari
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the capabilities of large language models, specifically GPT-4, in interpreting mammographic images. The analysis involved 120 mammographic images equally divided between cases with and without mammography's findings. Without additional context, the LLM was tasked to generate reports based solely on these images. GPT-4 correctly identified mammographic projections in 53.3% of cases and showed varying degrees of accuracy in identifying microcalcifications and masses. The study highlighted GPT-4's embryonic interpretative abilities with a sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 37.5%. However, a significant rate of false positives and false negatives, along with hallucinations, underscored the model's limitations. This exploratory test offers insights into the potential and risks of using LLMs in mammography interpretation, also underscoring the need for dedicated training, validation, and regulation of AI tools in healthcare to ensure their reliability and safety in clinical practice.

Discover OncologyVol. 16(1)
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Ospedale Maggiore (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
AI in cancer detection
17.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A preliminary investigation into the potential, pitfalls, and limitations of large language models for mammography interpretation — Chiara Trentin, Enrico Cassano, et al. · Discover Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS