Discriminating between cosmological models using data-driven methods

Context. This study examines the Pantheon+SH0ES dataset using the standard Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model as a prior and applies machine learning to assess deviations. Rather than assuming discrepancies, we tested the models’ goodness of fit and explored whether the data allow alternative cosmological features. Aims. The central goal is to evaluate the robustness of the ΛCDM model compared with other dark energy models, and to investigate whether there are deviations that might provide new cosmological insights. This study takes a data-driven approach, using traditional statistical methods and machine learning techniques. Methods. Initially, we evaluated six dark energy models using traditional statistical methods such as Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) and static or dynamic nested sampling to infer cosmological parameters. We then adopted a machine learning approach, developing a regression model to compute the distance modulus for each supernova and expanding the feature set to 74 statistical features. We used an ensemble of four models: multi-layer perceptron, k-nearest neighbours, random forest regressor, and gradient boosting. Cosmological parameters were estimated in four scenarios using MCMC and nested sampling, while feature selection techniques (random forest, Boruta, and the Shapley additive explanation) were applied in three. Results. Traditional statistical analysis confirms that the ΛCDM model is robust, yielding expected parameter values. Other models show deviations, with the generalised and modified Chaplygin gas models performing poorly. In the machine learning analysis, feature selection techniques, particularly Boruta, significantly improve model performance. In particular, models initially considered weak (generalised or modified Chaplygin gas) show significant improvement after feature selection. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a data-driven approach to cosmological model evaluation. The ΛCDM model remains robust, while machine learning techniques, in particular feature selection, reveal potential improvements to alternative models that could be relevant for new observational campaigns, such as the recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451779
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discriminating between cosmological models using data-driven methods

M. Brescia, S. Capozziello, Simone Vilardi
6 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
7.15
article

Discriminating between cosmological models using data-driven methods

M. Brescia, S. Capozziello, Simone Vilardi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Context. This study examines the Pantheon+SH0ES dataset using the standard Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model as a prior and applies machine learning to assess deviations. Rather than assuming discrepancies, we tested the models’ goodness of fit and explored whether the data allow alternative cosmological features. Aims. The central goal is to evaluate the robustness of the ΛCDM model compared with other dark energy models, and to investigate whether there are deviations that might provide new cosmological insights. This study takes a data-driven approach, using traditional statistical methods and machine learning techniques. Methods. Initially, we evaluated six dark energy models using traditional statistical methods such as Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) and static or dynamic nested sampling to infer cosmological parameters. We then adopted a machine learning approach, developing a regression model to compute the distance modulus for each supernova and expanding the feature set to 74 statistical features. We used an ensemble of four models: multi-layer perceptron, k-nearest neighbours, random forest regressor, and gradient boosting. Cosmological parameters were estimated in four scenarios using MCMC and nested sampling, while feature selection techniques (random forest, Boruta, and the Shapley additive explanation) were applied in three. Results. Traditional statistical analysis confirms that the ΛCDM model is robust, yielding expected parameter values. Other models show deviations, with the generalised and modified Chaplygin gas models performing poorly. In the machine learning analysis, feature selection techniques, particularly Boruta, significantly improve model performance. In particular, models initially considered weak (generalised or modified Chaplygin gas) show significant improvement after feature selection. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a data-driven approach to cosmological model evaluation. The ΛCDM model remains robust, while machine learning techniques, in particular feature selection, reveal potential improvements to alternative models that could be relevant for new observational campaigns, such as the recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 695
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
7.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discriminating between cosmological models using data-driven methods — M. Brescia, S. Capozziello, et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS