Exploring the commercial determinants of health in the online food delivery sector: a case study of Uber Eats in Australia

Large food and beverage corporations employ strategies to advance profits, often with adverse implications for public health. However, the practices of online food delivery companies have not been systematically examined from a public health perspective. This study aimed to explore the nature and extent of the corporate activities of Uber Eats Australia that may present a risk to public health. Using a theoretically guided qualitative design, we analysed Uber Eats’ strategies from 2016 to 2024 through a Commercial Determinants of Health framework. A total of 374 documents were identified through searches of academic and business databases, as well as Uber Eats’ social media and websites, and these were coded according and narratively synthesised. Uber Eats Australia commonly targeted food marketing toward families, often using celebrity endorsements and sponsoring major sporting events. It employs exclusivity agreements and accepts financial losses to expand market share, while promoting self-regulation by positioning itself as a partner of small businesses and the Australian economy. Gig-economy drivers, however, are frequently paid below minimum wage and experience poor working conditions. Additionally, the platform facilitates access to and promotion of unhealthy food options, contributing to poorer dietary health at a population level. Regulatory actions should be considered for the online food delivery sector to ensure public health is prioritised over corporate gain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2469776
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the commercial determinants of health in the online food delivery sector: a case study of Uber Eats in Australia

Oliver Huse, Benjamin Wood, Christina Zorbas, Kathryn Backholer et al.
9 citations
Critical Public Health
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
24.87
article

Exploring the commercial determinants of health in the online food delivery sector: a case study of Uber Eats in Australia

Oliver Huse, Benjamin Wood, Christina Zorbas, Kathryn Backholer, Gary Sacks, Rebecca Bennett
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Large food and beverage corporations employ strategies to advance profits, often with adverse implications for public health. However, the practices of online food delivery companies have not been systematically examined from a public health perspective. This study aimed to explore the nature and extent of the corporate activities of Uber Eats Australia that may present a risk to public health. Using a theoretically guided qualitative design, we analysed Uber Eats’ strategies from 2016 to 2024 through a Commercial Determinants of Health framework. A total of 374 documents were identified through searches of academic and business databases, as well as Uber Eats’ social media and websites, and these were coded according and narratively synthesised. Uber Eats Australia commonly targeted food marketing toward families, often using celebrity endorsements and sponsoring major sporting events. It employs exclusivity agreements and accepts financial losses to expand market share, while promoting self-regulation by positioning itself as a partner of small businesses and the Australian economy. Gig-economy drivers, however, are frequently paid below minimum wage and experience poor working conditions. Additionally, the platform facilitates access to and promotion of unhealthy food options, contributing to poorer dietary health at a population level. Regulatory actions should be considered for the online food delivery sector to ensure public health is prioritised over corporate gain.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
Deakin University (AU)
National Heart Foundation of Australia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
24.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.