A luta pelas garantias processuais e a mudança de paradigma em matéria de prova: do liberalismo à mass surveillance no processo penal europeu

Only with the open source information available of each any person it is possible through the adequate processing to create a detailed profile of practically all aspects of our private life. According to the algorithm used, this can lead to identify an individual as a "person of interest", and this it is only one step away from that same data being used to establish probable cause to open a criminal case, and if the case ends up in a trial, to present such data as evidence. This article discusses how the access to encrypted messaging platforms (as in the Encrochat case) and the massive processing of data through algorithms and artificial intelligence requires to rethink the whole structure of the criminal procedure. It advocates that there is a need to revisit the procedural safeguards developed during the past two centuries to be able to face the risks of the digital era. It concludes that there is a new shift in the gathering of evidence, which calls for strengthening the fair trial rights at the pre-trial stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v11i1.1164
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A luta pelas garantias processuais e a mudança de paradigma em matéria de prova: do liberalismo à mass surveillance no processo penal europeu

Lorena Bachmaier Winter
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

A luta pelas garantias processuais e a mudança de paradigma em matéria de prova: do liberalismo à mass surveillance no processo penal europeu

Lorena Bachmaier Winter
article en

Abstract

Only with the open source information available of each any person it is possible through the adequate processing to create a detailed profile of practically all aspects of our private life. According to the algorithm used, this can lead to identify an individual as a "person of interest", and this it is only one step away from that same data being used to establish probable cause to open a criminal case, and if the case ends up in a trial, to present such data as evidence. This article discusses how the access to encrypted messaging platforms (as in the Encrochat case) and the massive processing of data through algorithms and artificial intelligence requires to rethink the whole structure of the criminal procedure. It advocates that there is a need to revisit the procedural safeguards developed during the past two centuries to be able to face the risks of the digital era. It concludes that there is a new shift in the gathering of evidence, which calls for strengthening the fair trial rights at the pre-trial stage.

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual PenalVol. 11(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A luta pelas garantias processuais e a mudança de paradigma em matéria de prova: do liberalismo à mass surveillance no processo penal europeu — Lorena Bachmaier Winter · Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS