Event triggers and opinion leaders shape climate change discourse on Weibo

Understanding how real-world events and opinion leaders shape climate change discussions is vital for improving communication and policy formulation to meet global carbon mitigation goals. This study analyzed 5.3 million original posts from Weibo (2012–2022), China’s largest social media platform, to examine climate change discourse. We found five event types triggering 48 discussion peaks, including online activities, international conferences, extreme weather, domestic policies, and international news. Posts generally conveyed positive attitudes, though sentiment decreased during haze pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic. Network analysis revealed seven opinion leader groups with distinct strategies: official media and institutions emphasized political will, global initiatives, and socio-economic implications, while universities and grassroots individuals focused on scientific reality and personal actions. Celebrities and unofficial accounts often highlighted geopolitical topics, especially China-US relations. We suggest reducing fragmented echo chambers and fostering personal connections through digital media platforms to enhance public awareness. Climate discussions in Chinese social media are shaped by five event types and seven opinion leader groups, highlighting the need to bridge fragmented echo chambers and foster global connections on digital platforms, according to an analysis of 5.3 million Weibo posts from 2012 to 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02124-4
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Event triggers and opinion leaders shape climate change discourse on Weibo

Jianxun Yang, Yan Hu, Yuan Li, Jun Bi et al.
6 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Climate Change Communication and Perception
25.21
article

Event triggers and opinion leaders shape climate change discourse on Weibo

Jianxun Yang, Yan Hu, Yuan Li, Jun Bi, Zongwei Ma, Miaomiao Liu, Wen Fang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Understanding how real-world events and opinion leaders shape climate change discussions is vital for improving communication and policy formulation to meet global carbon mitigation goals. This study analyzed 5.3 million original posts from Weibo (2012–2022), China’s largest social media platform, to examine climate change discourse. We found five event types triggering 48 discussion peaks, including online activities, international conferences, extreme weather, domestic policies, and international news. Posts generally conveyed positive attitudes, though sentiment decreased during haze pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic. Network analysis revealed seven opinion leader groups with distinct strategies: official media and institutions emphasized political will, global initiatives, and socio-economic implications, while universities and grassroots individuals focused on scientific reality and personal actions. Celebrities and unofficial accounts often highlighted geopolitical topics, especially China-US relations. We suggest reducing fragmented echo chambers and fostering personal connections through digital media platforms to enhance public awareness. Climate discussions in Chinese social media are shaped by five event types and seven opinion leader groups, highlighting the need to bridge fragmented echo chambers and foster global connections on digital platforms, according to an analysis of 5.3 million Weibo posts from 2012 to 2022.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
Committee on Climate Change (GB), State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.