Benchmarking Uninitialized CMIP6 Simulations for Inter-Annual Surface Wind Predictions

This study investigates the potential of uninitialized global climate projections for providing 12-month (inter-annual) wind forecasts in Europe in light of the increasing demand for long-term climate predictions. This is important in a context where models based on the past climate may not fully account for the implications for climate variability of current warming trends, and where initialized 12-month forecasts are still not widely available (i.e., seasonal forecasts) and/or consolidated (i.e., decadal predictions). To this aim, we use two types of simulations: uninitialized climate projections from CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) and initialized 6-month seasonal forecasts (ECMWF’s SEAS5), using the latter as a benchmark. All the predictions are bias-corrected with five distinct approaches (quantile delta mapping, empirical quantile mapping, quantile delta mapping, scaling bias-adjustment and a proprietary quantile mapping) and verified against weather observations from the ECA&D E-OBS project (684 weather stations across Europe). It is observed that the quantile-mapping techniques outperform the other bias-correction algorithm in adjusting the cumulative distribution function (CDF) to the reference weather stations and, also, in reducing the mean bias error closer to zero. However, a simple bias -correction by scaling improves the time-series predictive accuracy (root mean square error, anomaly correlation coefficient and mean absolute scaled error) of CMIP6 simulations over quantile-mapping bias corrections. Thus, the results suggest that CMIP6 projections may provide a valuable preliminary framework for comprehending climate wind variations over the ensuing 12-month period. Finally, while baseline methods like climatology could still outperform the presented methods in terms of time-series accuracy (i.e., root mean square error), our approach highlights a key advantage: climatology is static, whereas CMIP6 offers a dynamic, evolving view of climatology. The combination of dynamism and bias correction makes CMIP6 projections a valuable starting point for understanding wind climate variations over the next 12 months. Furthermore, using workload schedulers within high-performance computing frameworks is essential for effectively handling these complex and ever-evolving datasets, highlighting the critical role of advanced computational methods in fully realizing the potential of CMIP6 for climate analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030254
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Uninitialized CMIP6 Simulations for Inter-Annual Surface Wind Predictions

María Carmen Llasat, Raül Marcos-Matamoros, Joan Saladich Cubero
Atmosphere
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Benchmarking Uninitialized CMIP6 Simulations for Inter-Annual Surface Wind Predictions

María Carmen Llasat, Raül Marcos-Matamoros, Joan Saladich Cubero
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of uninitialized global climate projections for providing 12-month (inter-annual) wind forecasts in Europe in light of the increasing demand for long-term climate predictions. This is important in a context where models based on the past climate may not fully account for the implications for climate variability of current warming trends, and where initialized 12-month forecasts are still not widely available (i.e., seasonal forecasts) and/or consolidated (i.e., decadal predictions). To this aim, we use two types of simulations: uninitialized climate projections from CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) and initialized 6-month seasonal forecasts (ECMWF’s SEAS5), using the latter as a benchmark. All the predictions are bias-corrected with five distinct approaches (quantile delta mapping, empirical quantile mapping, quantile delta mapping, scaling bias-adjustment and a proprietary quantile mapping) and verified against weather observations from the ECA&D E-OBS project (684 weather stations across Europe). It is observed that the quantile-mapping techniques outperform the other bias-correction algorithm in adjusting the cumulative distribution function (CDF) to the reference weather stations and, also, in reducing the mean bias error closer to zero. However, a simple bias -correction by scaling improves the time-series predictive accuracy (root mean square error, anomaly correlation coefficient and mean absolute scaled error) of CMIP6 simulations over quantile-mapping bias corrections. Thus, the results suggest that CMIP6 projections may provide a valuable preliminary framework for comprehending climate wind variations over the ensuing 12-month period. Finally, while baseline methods like climatology could still outperform the presented methods in terms of time-series accuracy (i.e., root mean square error), our approach highlights a key advantage: climatology is static, whereas CMIP6 offers a dynamic, evolving view of climatology. The combination of dynamism and bias correction makes CMIP6 projections a valuable starting point for understanding wind climate variations over the next 12 months. Furthermore, using workload schedulers within high-performance computing frameworks is essential for effectively handling these complex and ever-evolving datasets, highlighting the critical role of advanced computational methods in fully realizing the potential of CMIP6 for climate analysis.

AtmosphereVol. 16(3)
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.