Reducing false positives in strong lens detection through effective augmentation and ensemble learning

ABSTRACT This research studies the impact of high-quality training data sets on the performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in detecting strong gravitational lenses. We stress the importance of data diversity and representativeness, demonstrating how variations in sample populations influence CNN performance. In addition to the quality of training data, our results highlight the effectiveness of various techniques, such as data augmentation and ensemble learning, in reducing false positives while maintaining model completeness at an acceptable level. This enhances the robustness of gravitational lens detection models and advancing capabilities in this field. Our experiments, employing variations of DenseNet and EfficientNet, achieved a best false positive rate (FP rate) of $10^{-4}$, while successfully identifying over 88 per cent of genuine gravitational lenses in the test data set. This represents an 11-fold reduction in the FP rate compared to the original training data set. Notably, this substantial enhancement in the FP rate is accompanied by only a 2.3 per cent decrease in the number of true positive samples. Validated on the Kilo Degree Survey data set, our findings offer insights applicable to ongoing missions, like Euclid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf327
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing false positives in strong lens detection through effective augmentation and ensemble learning

J. P. McKean, Mitra Baratchi, Konrad H. Kuijken, Samira Rezaei et al.
2 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
2.27
article

Reducing false positives in strong lens detection through effective augmentation and ensemble learning

J. P. McKean, Mitra Baratchi, Konrad H. Kuijken, Samira Rezaei, L. V. E. Koopmans, B.C Nagam, Amirmohammad Chegeni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research studies the impact of high-quality training data sets on the performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in detecting strong gravitational lenses. We stress the importance of data diversity and representativeness, demonstrating how variations in sample populations influence CNN performance. In addition to the quality of training data, our results highlight the effectiveness of various techniques, such as data augmentation and ensemble learning, in reducing false positives while maintaining model completeness at an acceptable level. This enhances the robustness of gravitational lens detection models and advancing capabilities in this field. Our experiments, employing variations of DenseNet and EfficientNet, achieved a best false positive rate (FP rate) of $10^{-4}$, while successfully identifying over 88 per cent of genuine gravitational lenses in the test data set. This represents an 11-fold reduction in the FP rate compared to the original training data set. Notably, this substantial enhancement in the FP rate is accompanied by only a 2.3 per cent decrease in the number of true positive samples. Validated on the Kilo Degree Survey data set, our findings offer insights applicable to ongoing missions, like Euclid.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 538(2)
Leiden University (NL), University of Padua (IT), University of Groningen (NL), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova (IT), South African Radio Astronomy Observatory (ZA), Astronomical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.