Thermodynamic, economic, and carbon emission evaluation of various Organic Rankine cycle configurations for maximizing waste heat recovery potential

• ORC systems for waste heat recovery were analyzed using DWSIM, focusing on efficiency, economics, and emissions. • Toluene was the best working fluid, achieving 24.33% efficiency and 1,839.66 kW net power in the simple ORC. • The series ORC achieved the highest net power output and best economic performance. • Exergy analysis identified the evaporator as the main inefficiency source, highlighting areas for improvement. • The series ORC reduced CO₂ emissions by 12,971.36 tons/year, generating 1.04M EUR in carbon credit revenue. Waste heat recovery using the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) enhances energy efficiency, lowers emissions, and reduces costs. This study evaluates ORC systems for high-temperature waste heat recovery (515.14 °C) using DWSIM software. Various ORC configurations, including simple ORC (sORC), series ORC (S-ORC), single-stage regenerative ORC (SR-ORC), double-stage regenerative ORC (DR-ORC), and multi-evaporating pressure ORC (ME-ORC), were analyzed with different working fluids, including Toluene, Dodecane, Benzene, and Cyclopentane. Toluene was identified as the best working fluid, achieving a thermal efficiency of 24.33 % and a net power output of 1,839.66 kW in the sORC. The S-ORC demonstrated superior performance, delivering 3,679.32 kW of net power at the same efficiency. A parametric study examined the effects of operating pressure, exhaust gas temperature, and mass flow rate on efficiency. Results showed thermal efficiency peaked at 40.08 bar, with optimal performance at an exhaust gas temperature of 520 °C and a mass flow rate of 44.5 kg/s. Exergy analysis identified the evaporator as the main source of inefficiency, highlighting opportunities for improvement to boost overall system efficiency. Economically, the S-ORC achieved a Net Present Value (NPV) of 3.98 million EUR, a payback period of 5.75 years, and an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 12.66 %. It also reduced CO 2 emissions by 12,971.36 metric tons annually, translating to 1.04 million EUR in revenue through carbon credit trading under the EU ETS. In summary, the S-ORC configuration offers the best balance of thermodynamic, economic, and environmental benefits for industrial waste heat recovery systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100943
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermodynamic, economic, and carbon emission evaluation of various Organic Rankine cycle configurations for maximizing waste heat recovery potential

Yanin Sukjai, Yossapong Laoonual, Thepparat Klamrassamee, Tanatip Kittijungjit
4 citations
Energy Conversion and Management X
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
2.85
article

Thermodynamic, economic, and carbon emission evaluation of various Organic Rankine cycle configurations for maximizing waste heat recovery potential

Yanin Sukjai, Yossapong Laoonual, Thepparat Klamrassamee, Tanatip Kittijungjit
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• ORC systems for waste heat recovery were analyzed using DWSIM, focusing on efficiency, economics, and emissions. • Toluene was the best working fluid, achieving 24.33% efficiency and 1,839.66 kW net power in the simple ORC. • The series ORC achieved the highest net power output and best economic performance. • Exergy analysis identified the evaporator as the main inefficiency source, highlighting areas for improvement. • The series ORC reduced CO₂ emissions by 12,971.36 tons/year, generating 1.04M EUR in carbon credit revenue. Waste heat recovery using the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) enhances energy efficiency, lowers emissions, and reduces costs. This study evaluates ORC systems for high-temperature waste heat recovery (515.14 °C) using DWSIM software. Various ORC configurations, including simple ORC (sORC), series ORC (S-ORC), single-stage regenerative ORC (SR-ORC), double-stage regenerative ORC (DR-ORC), and multi-evaporating pressure ORC (ME-ORC), were analyzed with different working fluids, including Toluene, Dodecane, Benzene, and Cyclopentane. Toluene was identified as the best working fluid, achieving a thermal efficiency of 24.33 % and a net power output of 1,839.66 kW in the sORC. The S-ORC demonstrated superior performance, delivering 3,679.32 kW of net power at the same efficiency. A parametric study examined the effects of operating pressure, exhaust gas temperature, and mass flow rate on efficiency. Results showed thermal efficiency peaked at 40.08 bar, with optimal performance at an exhaust gas temperature of 520 °C and a mass flow rate of 44.5 kg/s. Exergy analysis identified the evaporator as the main source of inefficiency, highlighting opportunities for improvement to boost overall system efficiency. Economically, the S-ORC achieved a Net Present Value (NPV) of 3.98 million EUR, a payback period of 5.75 years, and an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 12.66 %. It also reduced CO 2 emissions by 12,971.36 metric tons annually, translating to 1.04 million EUR in revenue through carbon credit trading under the EU ETS. In summary, the S-ORC configuration offers the best balance of thermodynamic, economic, and environmental benefits for industrial waste heat recovery systems.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 26
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (TH)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia-Thailand Joint Authority, Thailand Science Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.