Cyclic behavior of reinforced rubberized concrete columns under flexure-shear interaction

The influence of rubber aggregate stiffness on the cyclic performance of concrete columns exhibiting flexure-shear interaction remains unclear. It is also uncertain whether existing design provisions can be applied effectively to rubberized concrete columns with these properties. This study examines the cyclic behavior of six circular columns designed for flexure-shear interaction at two ductility levels: limited (LD, μ ≤ 2 ) and moderate (MD, 2 < μ ≤ 4 ). The 500 mm diameter columns had an aspect ratio of 2.5 and a constant axial load ratio of 0.10 f c ′ A g . Columns with rubber contents by total aggregate volume of 10 % (R10), and 20 % (R20) were tested, along with a conventional concrete mix (CM2) of comparable compressive strength to R10 mix. R10 columns exhibited minor delays in concrete crushing and rebar buckling, with ductility increases of 10 % (LD) and 3 % (MD) and shear strength variations of less than 1 % compared to CM2. However, increasing rubber content to 20 % led to performance declines, with R20 columns showing shear strength reductions of 21 % (LD) and 14 % (MD) relative to their R10 counterparts. Assessment of design provisions for circular columns indicated that, for rubber contents up to 20 % and axial load ratios up to 10 %, shear strength and stiffness of rubberized concrete columns can be conservatively predicted by solely accounting for the change in compressive strength. • The cyclic responses of six conventional and rubberized columns were compared. • Columns with 10 % rubber content presented a slight increase in performance metrics. • Rubber aggregates did not affect shear decay but increased spiral strain. • No ductility gain with increased rubber content from 10 % to 20 %. • Design guidelines conservatively estimated the shear strength of RuC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119963
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cyclic behavior of reinforced rubberized concrete columns under flexure-shear interaction

Gabriele Chiaro, Ernesto Hernández, Alessandro Palermo, Allan Scott
3 citations
Engineering Structures
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
3.02
article

Cyclic behavior of reinforced rubberized concrete columns under flexure-shear interaction

Gabriele Chiaro, Ernesto Hernández, Alessandro Palermo, Allan Scott
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The influence of rubber aggregate stiffness on the cyclic performance of concrete columns exhibiting flexure-shear interaction remains unclear. It is also uncertain whether existing design provisions can be applied effectively to rubberized concrete columns with these properties. This study examines the cyclic behavior of six circular columns designed for flexure-shear interaction at two ductility levels: limited (LD, μ ≤ 2 ) and moderate (MD, 2 < μ ≤ 4 ). The 500 mm diameter columns had an aspect ratio of 2.5 and a constant axial load ratio of 0.10 f c ′ A g . Columns with rubber contents by total aggregate volume of 10 % (R10), and 20 % (R20) were tested, along with a conventional concrete mix (CM2) of comparable compressive strength to R10 mix. R10 columns exhibited minor delays in concrete crushing and rebar buckling, with ductility increases of 10 % (LD) and 3 % (MD) and shear strength variations of less than 1 % compared to CM2. However, increasing rubber content to 20 % led to performance declines, with R20 columns showing shear strength reductions of 21 % (LD) and 14 % (MD) relative to their R10 counterparts. Assessment of design provisions for circular columns indicated that, for rubber contents up to 20 % and axial load ratios up to 10 %, shear strength and stiffness of rubberized concrete columns can be conservatively predicted by solely accounting for the change in compressive strength. • The cyclic responses of six conventional and rubberized columns were compared. • Columns with 10 % rubber content presented a slight increase in performance metrics. • Rubber aggregates did not affect shear decay but increased spiral strain. • No ductility gain with increased rubber content from 10 % to 20 %. • Design guidelines conservatively estimated the shear strength of RuC.

Engineering StructuresVol. 330
University of Canterbury (NZ), University of California San Diego (US)
Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
3.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.