To preserve, monitor or eradicate: Covert rewilding as an emerging conservation trilemma for wildlife managers

Global biodiversity is currently facing an unprecedented extinction rate because of increased anthropogenic pressures, which often cause local or regional extirpations of wildlife populations. Once extinct from a given region, wildlife populations might be officially reintroduced upon the cessation of the threats that caused past declines. However, official translocations often undergo a lengthy assessment process and can be refused by environmental authorities due to various uncertainties related to expected benefits, potential impacts or long-term viability, as well as the risk-averse attitude exhibited by some decision makers. In response to these obstacles and the growing social consideration of official translocations, illegal actors are conducting unauthorized releases of threatened wildlife, which is referred to as covert rewilding. Covert rewilding is an emerging conservation issue that often involves several management challenges and complexities. Here, we provide a decision-making framework to guide management actions once covertly translocated populations are discovered. For this, we used three illegally translocated populations of threatened aquatic vertebrates in southeastern Iberia as case studies, aiming to illustrate the three available management options: to preserve, monitor, or eradicate. Moreover, we provide practical recommendations to tackle covert rewilding at its source and prevent further unauthorized translocations. Our study provides an overview of covert rewilding to increase the visibility of this conservation issue, as well as to advocate for the implementation of preventive actions as the most cost-effective management approach. • Covert rewilding describes the illegal release of threatened species in the pursuit of conservation. • The management of covertly translocated populations entails several challenges. • We provide a framework to inform decision-making once covertly translocated populations are discovered. • Increased social awareness on potential impacts of covert rewilding is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111039
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To preserve, monitor or eradicate: Covert rewilding as an emerging conservation trilemma for wildlife managers

José Manuel Zamora‐Marín, Francisco J. Oliva‐Paterna, José A. Sánchez‐Zapata, David Sánchez‐Fernández et al.
1 citations
Biological Conservation
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
2.31
article

To preserve, monitor or eradicate: Covert rewilding as an emerging conservation trilemma for wildlife managers

José Manuel Zamora‐Marín, Francisco J. Oliva‐Paterna, José A. Sánchez‐Zapata, David Sánchez‐Fernández, Mar Torralva, Adrián Guerrero‐Gómez, Antonio Zamora‐López
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Global biodiversity is currently facing an unprecedented extinction rate because of increased anthropogenic pressures, which often cause local or regional extirpations of wildlife populations. Once extinct from a given region, wildlife populations might be officially reintroduced upon the cessation of the threats that caused past declines. However, official translocations often undergo a lengthy assessment process and can be refused by environmental authorities due to various uncertainties related to expected benefits, potential impacts or long-term viability, as well as the risk-averse attitude exhibited by some decision makers. In response to these obstacles and the growing social consideration of official translocations, illegal actors are conducting unauthorized releases of threatened wildlife, which is referred to as covert rewilding. Covert rewilding is an emerging conservation issue that often involves several management challenges and complexities. Here, we provide a decision-making framework to guide management actions once covertly translocated populations are discovered. For this, we used three illegally translocated populations of threatened aquatic vertebrates in southeastern Iberia as case studies, aiming to illustrate the three available management options: to preserve, monitor, or eradicate. Moreover, we provide practical recommendations to tackle covert rewilding at its source and prevent further unauthorized translocations. Our study provides an overview of covert rewilding to increase the visibility of this conservation issue, as well as to advocate for the implementation of preventive actions as the most cost-effective management approach. • Covert rewilding describes the illegal release of threatened species in the pursuit of conservation. • The management of covertly translocated populations entails several challenges. • We provide a framework to inform decision-making once covertly translocated populations are discovered. • Increased social awareness on potential impacts of covert rewilding is required.

Biological ConservationVol. 304
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.