Comparative Analysis of Microbial Growth in Raw and Pasteurized Cow and Camel Milk During Chilled Storage

Camel milk has been an integral component of diets in the Middle East for millennia. The current study aimed to evaluate microbial changes in pasteurized camel and cow milk using culture-based methods. We examined bacterial growth in raw and pasteurized camel and cow milk during 17 days of refrigerated storage at 4 °C. Raw camel milk had a mean initial bacterial count of 4.13 × 10³ CFU/mL, peaking at 2.87 × 106 CFU/mL by day 17. Pasteurization reduced the count to 2 × 10¹ CFU/mL, rising to 40 × 104 CFU/mL by day 17. Raw cow milk started at 1.08 × 104 CFU/mL, reaching 3.15 × 106 CFU/mL, while pasteurized cow milk increased from 31.12 CFU/mL to 4.06 × 106 CFU/mL. Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Lactobacillus spp. exhibited significant proliferation in raw camel and cow milk. The growth reached a high point of 5.27 × 104 CFU/mL for coagulase-positive S. aureus and 3.74 × 104 CFU/mL for Lactobacillus spp. in raw camel milk. In raw cow milk, it reached a high point of 1.20 × 105 CFU/mL for coagulase-positive S. aureus and 5.0 × 105 CFU/mL for Lactobacillus spp., these results show that these microorganisms grow in different ways in camel milk and cow milk. This shows how vulnerable raw milk is to microbial growth. Pasteurized samples showed no S. aureus or Lactobacillus spp. growth, confirming pasteurization’s effectiveness. The study detected no fungal or pathogenic contamination. In conclusion, camel milk exhibited higher initial bacterial counts and slower bacterial growth than cow milk, but supported more sustained microbial proliferation over time. Pasteurization was equally effective for both types, eliminating Lactobacillus spp. and reducing bacterial loads significantly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.19.1.23
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Microbial Growth in Raw and Pasteurized Cow and Camel Milk During Chilled Storage

Emad M. Abdallah, Mohammed Abdullah Aladhadh
2 citations
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
2.32
article

Comparative Analysis of Microbial Growth in Raw and Pasteurized Cow and Camel Milk During Chilled Storage

Emad M. Abdallah, Mohammed Abdullah Aladhadh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Camel milk has been an integral component of diets in the Middle East for millennia. The current study aimed to evaluate microbial changes in pasteurized camel and cow milk using culture-based methods. We examined bacterial growth in raw and pasteurized camel and cow milk during 17 days of refrigerated storage at 4 °C. Raw camel milk had a mean initial bacterial count of 4.13 × 10³ CFU/mL, peaking at 2.87 × 106 CFU/mL by day 17. Pasteurization reduced the count to 2 × 10¹ CFU/mL, rising to 40 × 104 CFU/mL by day 17. Raw cow milk started at 1.08 × 104 CFU/mL, reaching 3.15 × 106 CFU/mL, while pasteurized cow milk increased from 31.12 CFU/mL to 4.06 × 106 CFU/mL. Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Lactobacillus spp. exhibited significant proliferation in raw camel and cow milk. The growth reached a high point of 5.27 × 104 CFU/mL for coagulase-positive S. aureus and 3.74 × 104 CFU/mL for Lactobacillus spp. in raw camel milk. In raw cow milk, it reached a high point of 1.20 × 105 CFU/mL for coagulase-positive S. aureus and 5.0 × 105 CFU/mL for Lactobacillus spp., these results show that these microorganisms grow in different ways in camel milk and cow milk. This shows how vulnerable raw milk is to microbial growth. Pasteurized samples showed no S. aureus or Lactobacillus spp. growth, confirming pasteurization’s effectiveness. The study detected no fungal or pathogenic contamination. In conclusion, camel milk exhibited higher initial bacterial counts and slower bacterial growth than cow milk, but supported more sustained microbial proliferation over time. Pasteurization was equally effective for both types, eliminating Lactobacillus spp. and reducing bacterial loads significantly.

Journal of Pure and Applied MicrobiologyVol. 19(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.