Comparative evaluation of productivity indicators in carbonate reservoir modeling by a case study for the Mishrif Formation in the Iraqi Buzurgan Oilfield

Valid projection of Well productivity is essential for carrying out appropriate criteria and to avoid increasing the cost of exploration and development. A combination of various reservoir evaluation procedures can be beneficial to estimate Well productivity according to different data, including seismic, mud logging, well logging, well-testing, formation test data, etc. In this study, the productivity index was extracted based on well logging and well-testing by Interactive Petrophysics and Saphir™ to comprehend reservoir productivity behavior and be a valuable guide for planning future drilling processes. The results indicated that the correlation between the J-predicted and productivity index (PI) results from the well-logs interpretation is power law in the northern part of the field and linear in the south. The average porosity values in the southern part of the Buzurgan field are lower than in the north and the average water saturation and permeability in the south are slightly higher than in the north. On the other hand, the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) analysis for PI identifier and PI by well-logging and Well-testing shows that the southern part of the field has a better PI than the north. The MB21 was the best unit in the Mishrif reservoir in the field. Likewise, the oil reserve in the south of the field is higher than in the north due to the Net-to-Gross and bulk volume results, especially in zone 5, representing the MB21 unit. In addition, the water saturation model shows that the oil–water contact (OWC) is at a depth of − 3877 m in the south part and 3885 m in the north. By examining the Well performance using the Ecrin program, the Productivity Index of layer MB21 is equal to 6.3 in the south and 5.9 in the north. Finally, the volume of the Oil initially in place (STOIIP) for the Mishrif Formation is estimated to be approximately 4138.7 million barrels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Geoscience
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00118-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of productivity indicators in carbonate reservoir modeling by a case study for the Mishrif Formation in the Iraqi Buzurgan Oilfield

Ahmed N. Al-Dujaili, Mohammed A. Khashman, Hamed Shirazi
1 citations
Discover Geoscience
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
article

Comparative evaluation of productivity indicators in carbonate reservoir modeling by a case study for the Mishrif Formation in the Iraqi Buzurgan Oilfield

Ahmed N. Al-Dujaili, Mohammed A. Khashman, Hamed Shirazi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Valid projection of Well productivity is essential for carrying out appropriate criteria and to avoid increasing the cost of exploration and development. A combination of various reservoir evaluation procedures can be beneficial to estimate Well productivity according to different data, including seismic, mud logging, well logging, well-testing, formation test data, etc. In this study, the productivity index was extracted based on well logging and well-testing by Interactive Petrophysics and Saphir™ to comprehend reservoir productivity behavior and be a valuable guide for planning future drilling processes. The results indicated that the correlation between the J-predicted and productivity index (PI) results from the well-logs interpretation is power law in the northern part of the field and linear in the south. The average porosity values in the southern part of the Buzurgan field are lower than in the north and the average water saturation and permeability in the south are slightly higher than in the north. On the other hand, the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) analysis for PI identifier and PI by well-logging and Well-testing shows that the southern part of the field has a better PI than the north. The MB21 was the best unit in the Mishrif reservoir in the field. Likewise, the oil reserve in the south of the field is higher than in the north due to the Net-to-Gross and bulk volume results, especially in zone 5, representing the MB21 unit. In addition, the water saturation model shows that the oil–water contact (OWC) is at a depth of − 3877 m in the south part and 3885 m in the north. By examining the Well performance using the Ecrin program, the Productivity Index of layer MB21 is equal to 6.3 in the south and 5.9 in the north. Finally, the volume of the Oil initially in place (STOIIP) for the Mishrif Formation is estimated to be approximately 4138.7 million barrels.

Discover GeoscienceVol. 3(1)
Petroleum University of Technology (IR), Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.