Investigation of the Discrepancy Between Optically and Gravimetrically Calculated Fiber Volume Fraction in Flax-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer

The fiber volume fraction significantly influences the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites. However, accurate measurements can be particularly challenging in natural-fiber-reinforced polymers. This study compared indirect methods using gravimetric and volumetric measurements with a U-Net-based direct method using micro-CT images for flax-fiber-reinforced polymers made via compression molding at 2.33–13.5 bar. A notable discrepancy was observed between the direct and indirect methods, with the latter yielding a fiber volume fraction approximately 25% lower than what could be determined optically. This difference arose from the matrix being absorbed by the fibers, resulting in a mixed region between dry fiber and pure matrix, further explained using a four-phase model. Our findings indicate that the volume fraction depended on the applied pressure. Specifically, we established a linear relationship between the fiber volume fraction and the pressure up to 9.4 bar, beyond which the fiber volume fraction plateaued. Furthermore, we examined the impact of void distribution in relation to pressure. At lower pressures, voids were distributed irregularly throughout the composite, whereas at higher pressures, the overall number of voids decreased, and they tended to concentrate primarily in the center.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9030103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of the Discrepancy Between Optically and Gravimetrically Calculated Fiber Volume Fraction in Flax-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer

Armin Wittmann, Georg Fischer, Klaus Peter Koch, Christoph Maier et al.
1 citations
Journal of Composites Science
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
0.61
article

Investigation of the Discrepancy Between Optically and Gravimetrically Calculated Fiber Volume Fraction in Flax-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer

Armin Wittmann, Georg Fischer, Klaus Peter Koch, Christoph Maier, Alexander Beckmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The fiber volume fraction significantly influences the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites. However, accurate measurements can be particularly challenging in natural-fiber-reinforced polymers. This study compared indirect methods using gravimetric and volumetric measurements with a U-Net-based direct method using micro-CT images for flax-fiber-reinforced polymers made via compression molding at 2.33–13.5 bar. A notable discrepancy was observed between the direct and indirect methods, with the latter yielding a fiber volume fraction approximately 25% lower than what could be determined optically. This difference arose from the matrix being absorbed by the fibers, resulting in a mixed region between dry fiber and pure matrix, further explained using a four-phase model. Our findings indicate that the volume fraction depended on the applied pressure. Specifically, we established a linear relationship between the fiber volume fraction and the pressure up to 9.4 bar, beyond which the fiber volume fraction plateaued. Furthermore, we examined the impact of void distribution in relation to pressure. At lower pressures, voids were distributed irregularly throughout the composite, whereas at higher pressures, the overall number of voids decreased, and they tended to concentrate primarily in the center.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 9(3)
Trier University of Applied Sciences (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
0.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.