The Impact of Midline Deviation on Smile Attractiveness: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Laypersons

Objective This study aimed to assess laypersons' perceptions of smile aesthetics in relation to upper dental midline deviations and to determine whether adjacent facial structures influence their judgments. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted using two sets of photographs depicting midline deviations. The first set included six images showing only the lips, while the second set featured six images displaying the lips, chin, and two-thirds of the nose. Both sets presented deviations at increments of 0 mm (no shift), 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm relative to the facial midline. The photographs were randomly labeled (A-F) and presented in a nonsequential order to prevent bias. Laypersons rated the attractiveness of each smile on a scale of 1 (very unattractive) to 10 (very attractive). Data were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS software version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Responses from 242 laypersons (127 females and 115 males) revealed that midline deviations of up to 3 mm were considered aesthetically acceptable across both photo sets. Friedman's test indicated statistically significant differences in ratings for each midline shift in both groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between ratings for smiles showing only the lips and those including the lips, chin, and nose. Additionally, gender and age did not significantly influence perceptions of smile attractiveness. Conclusions Laypersons perceive midline deviations of up to 3 mm as attractive, regardless of whether adjacent facial structures are included in the images. These findings suggest that the presence of additional facial features does not significantly alter aesthetic judgments of midline deviations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.79479
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Midline Deviation on Smile Attractiveness: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Laypersons

Lana Hodali, Nabil Massad
1 citations
Cureus
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
1.68
article

The Impact of Midline Deviation on Smile Attractiveness: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Laypersons

Lana Hodali, Nabil Massad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess laypersons' perceptions of smile aesthetics in relation to upper dental midline deviations and to determine whether adjacent facial structures influence their judgments. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted using two sets of photographs depicting midline deviations. The first set included six images showing only the lips, while the second set featured six images displaying the lips, chin, and two-thirds of the nose. Both sets presented deviations at increments of 0 mm (no shift), 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm relative to the facial midline. The photographs were randomly labeled (A-F) and presented in a nonsequential order to prevent bias. Laypersons rated the attractiveness of each smile on a scale of 1 (very unattractive) to 10 (very attractive). Data were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS software version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Responses from 242 laypersons (127 females and 115 males) revealed that midline deviations of up to 3 mm were considered aesthetically acceptable across both photo sets. Friedman's test indicated statistically significant differences in ratings for each midline shift in both groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between ratings for smiles showing only the lips and those including the lips, chin, and nose. Additionally, gender and age did not significantly influence perceptions of smile attractiveness. Conclusions Laypersons perceive midline deviations of up to 3 mm as attractive, regardless of whether adjacent facial structures are included in the images. These findings suggest that the presence of additional facial features does not significantly alter aesthetic judgments of midline deviations.

CureusVol. 17(2)
An-Najah National University (PS)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.