Advancing Criminal Law and Procedure Regulating Military Accountability and Enhancing the Appellate Process Through Effective Administration of Electronic Proceedings

Objectives: This study aims to explore the advancements in criminal law and procedure concerning military accountability and the appellate process, with a particular focus on the effective administration of electronic proceedings. The research seeks to identify current barriers, assess the impact of technology on military justice, and propose recommendations for enhancing accountability and efficiency within the military legal framework. Methods: A descriptive research design was employed, utilizing a combination of surveys, document analysis, and observational studies. Surveys were distributed to military legal professionals and personnel to gather insights on their experiences with electronic proceedings and the appellate process. Additionally, relevant legal documents, policies, and case studies were analyzed to provide a comprehensive overview of existing practices and outcomes. Results: The findings indicate that while electronic proceedings have improved accessibility and efficiency in the military justice system, significant challenges remain, including issues related to data security, training, and the integration of technology into traditional legal processes. Survey results revealed a mixed perception among military personnel regarding the effectiveness of electronic proceedings in enhancing accountability and expediting the appellate process. Conclusions: The study concludes that advancing criminal law and procedure in the military context requires a multifaceted approach that addresses both technological and procedural challenges. Recommendations include the development of standardized protocols for electronic proceedings, enhanced training for legal personnel, and ongoing evaluation of technology's impact on military accountability. By implementing these measures, the military justice system can better serve its objectives of fairness, efficiency, and accountability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n03.pe05402
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Criminal Law and Procedure Regulating Military Accountability and Enhancing the Appellate Process Through Effective Administration of Electronic Proceedings

Олександр Шевчук, M.S. Moisieiev, Iryna Kozakova, Dmytro Viktorovych Lisnichenko et al.
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
International Law and Human Rights
article

Advancing Criminal Law and Procedure Regulating Military Accountability and Enhancing the Appellate Process Through Effective Administration of Electronic Proceedings

Олександр Шевчук, M.S. Moisieiev, Iryna Kozakova, Dmytro Viktorovych Lisnichenko, Maryna Zaitseva
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the advancements in criminal law and procedure concerning military accountability and the appellate process, with a particular focus on the effective administration of electronic proceedings. The research seeks to identify current barriers, assess the impact of technology on military justice, and propose recommendations for enhancing accountability and efficiency within the military legal framework. Methods: A descriptive research design was employed, utilizing a combination of surveys, document analysis, and observational studies. Surveys were distributed to military legal professionals and personnel to gather insights on their experiences with electronic proceedings and the appellate process. Additionally, relevant legal documents, policies, and case studies were analyzed to provide a comprehensive overview of existing practices and outcomes. Results: The findings indicate that while electronic proceedings have improved accessibility and efficiency in the military justice system, significant challenges remain, including issues related to data security, training, and the integration of technology into traditional legal processes. Survey results revealed a mixed perception among military personnel regarding the effectiveness of electronic proceedings in enhancing accountability and expediting the appellate process. Conclusions: The study concludes that advancing criminal law and procedure in the military context requires a multifaceted approach that addresses both technological and procedural challenges. Recommendations include the development of standardized protocols for electronic proceedings, enhanced training for legal personnel, and ongoing evaluation of technology's impact on military accountability. By implementing these measures, the military justice system can better serve its objectives of fairness, efficiency, and accountability.

Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs ReviewVol. 5(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancing Criminal Law and Procedure Regulating Military Accountability and Enhancing the Appellate Process Through Effective Administration of Electronic Proceedings — Олександр Шевчук, M.S. Moisieiev, et al. · Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS