Mandated Sick Pay: Coverage, Utilization, and Crowding-in
Using the National Compensation Survey from 2009 to 2022 and difference-in-differences methods, we find that state-level sick pay mandates are effective in broadening access to paid sick leave for U.S. workers. Increases in sick pay coverage reach 30 percentage points from a 63% baseline 5 years post-mandate. Mandates have more bite in jobs with low pre-mandate coverage. Further, mandates reduce inequality in access to paid sick leave substantially, both across and within firms. COVID-19 reinforced existing upward trends in coverage and take-up. Five years post mandate, sick leave use has linearly increased to 2.4 days per year for marginal jobs. Finally, we find <i>crowding-in</i> of non-mandated benefits, which we label "job upscaling" by firms to differentiate jobs and attract labor.
Authors
- Johanna Catherine Maclean
- Stefan Pichler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0904-8268)
- Nicolas R. Ziebarth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-2371)
Institutions
- Technische Hochschule Mannheim (DE)
- George Mason University (US)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- University of Mannheim (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the European Economic Association
- Published
- 2025-02-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaf008
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Policy and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 18.79
Funders
- W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
- Washington Center for Equitable Growth
- Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung
- National Institutes of Health
- Weill Cornell Medical College