Abstract A114: Impact of liver metastases and systemic biomarkers on immunotherapy response and survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors

Abstract Background: As not all patients respond to immunotherapy, it is important to identify patients who are likely to benefit from treatment. Several factors such as hypoalbuminemia, elevated neutrophil counts, and increased LDH have been associated with poor response to immunotherapy and reduced survival outcomes. Similarly, liver metastases are associated with poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and survival in patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. However, its impact across all solid tumors and the effect of the location, number, and size of liver metastases on treatment outcomes is unknown. We therefore evaluated 595 patients with solid tumors treated on immunotherapy-based clinical trials in the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at MD Anderson Cancer Center between March 2016 and February 2022. Methods: Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data of the 595 patients were collected by review of their electronic medical records after obtaining informed consent. Using baseline CT images, based on the lobes involved, number, and size of liver metastases, we categorized liver metastases as mild, moderate, and severe. Responders were patients who had complete or partial response, or stable disease ≥6 months per RECISTv1.1. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time interval between treatment initiation and death was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results: Majority of the patients were female, white, ECOG of 1, had either gynecologic or gastrointestinal cancer. Of 595 patients, 470 were evaluable for response, 186 had liver metastases while 284 had no liver metastasis. Albumin level <3.5 gm/dL (p=0.018), neutrophils >7.3 K/uL (p=0.005), LDH >225 U/L (p<0.001) were associated with non-response, while lymphocyte count >1.0 K/uL was associated with improved response (p=0.004). Similarly, median OS was significantly lower in patients with albumin level <3.5 gm/dL (P<0.001), neutrophils >7.3 K/uL (p=0.003), LDH >225 U/L (p=0.002), while it was higher in patients with lymphocyte count >1.0 K/uL (p= 0.001). Non-response was significantly associated with liver metastases (46.4% vs 26.8%, p <0.001). Stratified by response status, similar rates were observed in mild/moderate vs severe metastases groups (22.2% vs 24.2% non-responders; 14.6% vs 12.2% responders, pairwise p=0.54). The median OS was significantly lower in patients with liver metastases (6.51 months) vs those without (12.75 months; p<0.001). The median OS was also significantly lower in patients with ascites (5.62 months) vs those without (10.28 months; p<0.001) and in patients with liver metastases and ascites (5.62 months) vs those without (9.72 months; p=0.003). Conclusion: Patients with liver metastasis, regardless of severity of disease, have significantly poor response to immunotherapy and OS. This hypothesis generating finding suggest that initiating immunotherapy prior to the development of liver metastases could lead to better treatment outcomes. If validated, this approach could be practice changing. Citation Format: Bettzy Stephen, Evan Kwiatkowski, Marcus R Anderson, Mohamed H Derbala, Israa Salih, Lilibeth Castillo, Yali Yang, Serdar A Gurses, Joann T Lim, Albert R Klekers, Hung Le, Lei Kang, Mingxuan Xu, Jibran Ahmed, Harold N Tan, Stephane Champiat, Tin-Yun Tang, Ecaterina E Dumbrava, Siqing Fu, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Jordi Rodon Ahnert, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Timothy Yap, Ying Yuan, David S Hong, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Bhosale Priya, Aung Naing. Impact of liver metastases and systemic biomarkers on immunotherapy response and survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR IO Conference: Discovery and Innovation in Cancer Immunology: Revolutionizing Treatment through Immunotherapy; 2025 Feb 23-26; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A114.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Immunology Research
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.io2025-a114
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A114: Impact of liver metastases and systemic biomarkers on immunotherapy response and survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors

Aung Naing, Israa Salih, Hung Le, Tin‐Yun Tang et al.
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Abstract A114: Impact of liver metastases and systemic biomarkers on immunotherapy response and survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors

Aung Naing, Israa Salih, Hung Le, Tin‐Yun Tang, B. Priya, Mohamed H. Derbala, Ying Yuan, David S. Hong, Sarina A. Piha‐Paul, Evan Kwiatkowski, Marcus Anderson, Jordi Rodón, Serdar A. Gurses, Albert R. Klekers, Hao Yang Tan, Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou, Siqing Fu, Jibran Ahmed, Stéphane Champiat, Timothy Anthony Yap, Funda Meric‐Bernstam, Bettzy Stephen, Mingxuan Xu, Lilibeth Castillo, Lei Kang, Yali Yang, JoAnn Lim, Ecaterina E Ileana Dumbrava
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: As not all patients respond to immunotherapy, it is important to identify patients who are likely to benefit from treatment. Several factors such as hypoalbuminemia, elevated neutrophil counts, and increased LDH have been associated with poor response to immunotherapy and reduced survival outcomes. Similarly, liver metastases are associated with poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and survival in patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. However, its impact across all solid tumors and the effect of the location, number, and size of liver metastases on treatment outcomes is unknown. We therefore evaluated 595 patients with solid tumors treated on immunotherapy-based clinical trials in the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at MD Anderson Cancer Center between March 2016 and February 2022. Methods: Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data of the 595 patients were collected by review of their electronic medical records after obtaining informed consent. Using baseline CT images, based on the lobes involved, number, and size of liver metastases, we categorized liver metastases as mild, moderate, and severe. Responders were patients who had complete or partial response, or stable disease ≥6 months per RECISTv1.1. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time interval between treatment initiation and death was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results: Majority of the patients were female, white, ECOG of 1, had either gynecologic or gastrointestinal cancer. Of 595 patients, 470 were evaluable for response, 186 had liver metastases while 284 had no liver metastasis. Albumin level <3.5 gm/dL (p=0.018), neutrophils >7.3 K/uL (p=0.005), LDH >225 U/L (p<0.001) were associated with non-response, while lymphocyte count >1.0 K/uL was associated with improved response (p=0.004). Similarly, median OS was significantly lower in patients with albumin level <3.5 gm/dL (P<0.001), neutrophils >7.3 K/uL (p=0.003), LDH >225 U/L (p=0.002), while it was higher in patients with lymphocyte count >1.0 K/uL (p= 0.001). Non-response was significantly associated with liver metastases (46.4% vs 26.8%, p <0.001). Stratified by response status, similar rates were observed in mild/moderate vs severe metastases groups (22.2% vs 24.2% non-responders; 14.6% vs 12.2% responders, pairwise p=0.54). The median OS was significantly lower in patients with liver metastases (6.51 months) vs those without (12.75 months; p<0.001). The median OS was also significantly lower in patients with ascites (5.62 months) vs those without (10.28 months; p<0.001) and in patients with liver metastases and ascites (5.62 months) vs those without (9.72 months; p=0.003). Conclusion: Patients with liver metastasis, regardless of severity of disease, have significantly poor response to immunotherapy and OS. This hypothesis generating finding suggest that initiating immunotherapy prior to the development of liver metastases could lead to better treatment outcomes. If validated, this approach could be practice changing. Citation Format: Bettzy Stephen, Evan Kwiatkowski, Marcus R Anderson, Mohamed H Derbala, Israa Salih, Lilibeth Castillo, Yali Yang, Serdar A Gurses, Joann T Lim, Albert R Klekers, Hung Le, Lei Kang, Mingxuan Xu, Jibran Ahmed, Harold N Tan, Stephane Champiat, Tin-Yun Tang, Ecaterina E Dumbrava, Siqing Fu, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Jordi Rodon Ahnert, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Timothy Yap, Ying Yuan, David S Hong, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Bhosale Priya, Aung Naing. Impact of liver metastases and systemic biomarkers on immunotherapy response and survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR IO Conference: Discovery and Innovation in Cancer Immunology: Revolutionizing Treatment through Immunotherapy; 2025 Feb 23-26; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A114.

Cancer Immunology ResearchVol. 13(2_Supplement)
National Institutes of Health (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.