Open Source Evaluatology: An evaluation framework and methodology for open source ecosystems based on evaluatology

The open-source ecosystem, as an important component of the modern software industry, has increasingly attracted attention from both academia and industry regarding its evaluation. However, current open-source evaluation methods face several issues, such as inconsistent evaluation standards, lack of theoretical support in the evaluation process, and poor comparability of evaluation results. Guided by the foundational theories of evaluatology, this paper proposes a new interdisciplinary research field, Open Source Evaluatology, and constructs an evaluation theoretical framework and methodology for open-source ecosystems. The main contributions of this paper include: (1) Based on the five axioms of evaluation theory, a theoretical system for Open Source Evaluatology is developed, and the basic concepts, evaluation dimensions, and evaluation standards for the open-source ecosystem are proposed; (2) An evaluation conditions (EC) framework is designed, encompassing five levels: problem definition, task instances, algorithm mechanisms, implementation examples, and supporting systems. A combined evaluation model (EM) based on statistical metrics and network metrics is also introduced; (3) Experimental validation using the GitHub dataset shows that the proposed evaluation framework effectively assesses various features of open-source projects, developers, and communities, and has been verified in multiple practical application scenarios. The research demonstrates that Open Source Evaluatology provides a standardized theoretical guide and methodological support for open-source ecosystem evaluation, which can be widely applied in various scenarios, such as open-source project selection, developer evaluation, and community management, and plays a significant role in promoting the healthy and sustainable development of open-source ecosystems. • This paper constructs a theoretical system for Open Source Evaluatology tailored to the open-source ecosystem. • This paper designs evaluation conditions and evaluation models that are adapted to the characteristics of the open-source ecosystem. • Using the GitHub open-source dataset, the paper validates the effectiveness of the proposed framework and applies it to evaluate open-source projects, developers, and communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2025.100190
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open Source Evaluatology: An evaluation framework and methodology for open source ecosystems based on evaluatology

Fei Han, Yang Chen, Jian Peng, Shengyu Zhao et al.
BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Open Source Evaluatology: An evaluation framework and methodology for open source ecosystems based on evaluatology

Fei Han, Yang Chen, Jian Peng, Shengyu Zhao, Yuanzhi Tang, Xiaoya Xia, Chunqi Tian, Wei Wang, Liyun Yang, Aoying Zhou, Lan You, Xuan Zhou, Weining Qian
article en

Abstract

The open-source ecosystem, as an important component of the modern software industry, has increasingly attracted attention from both academia and industry regarding its evaluation. However, current open-source evaluation methods face several issues, such as inconsistent evaluation standards, lack of theoretical support in the evaluation process, and poor comparability of evaluation results. Guided by the foundational theories of evaluatology, this paper proposes a new interdisciplinary research field, Open Source Evaluatology, and constructs an evaluation theoretical framework and methodology for open-source ecosystems. The main contributions of this paper include: (1) Based on the five axioms of evaluation theory, a theoretical system for Open Source Evaluatology is developed, and the basic concepts, evaluation dimensions, and evaluation standards for the open-source ecosystem are proposed; (2) An evaluation conditions (EC) framework is designed, encompassing five levels: problem definition, task instances, algorithm mechanisms, implementation examples, and supporting systems. A combined evaluation model (EM) based on statistical metrics and network metrics is also introduced; (3) Experimental validation using the GitHub dataset shows that the proposed evaluation framework effectively assesses various features of open-source projects, developers, and communities, and has been verified in multiple practical application scenarios. The research demonstrates that Open Source Evaluatology provides a standardized theoretical guide and methodological support for open-source ecosystem evaluation, which can be widely applied in various scenarios, such as open-source project selection, developer evaluation, and community management, and plays a significant role in promoting the healthy and sustainable development of open-source ecosystems. • This paper constructs a theoretical system for Open Source Evaluatology tailored to the open-source ecosystem. • This paper designs evaluation conditions and evaluation models that are adapted to the characteristics of the open-source ecosystem. • Using the GitHub open-source dataset, the paper validates the effectiveness of the proposed framework and applies it to evaluate open-source projects, developers, and communities.

BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and EvaluationsVol. 4(4)
Tongji University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Zhejiang Energy Group (China) (CN), China Electronics Standardization Institute (CN), Alibaba Group (China) (CN), East China Normal University (CN), Hubei University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.