Microseismicity in the Large‐N Swath‐D Network: Revealing Seismic Sequences and Active Faults in the Eastern Alps

Abstract Uniformly spaced large‐N seismic networks like the Swath‐D (2017–2019), a densified part of the AlpArray initiative, provide unmatched opportunities to study microseismic activity and fault structures. Here, we show how the combined analysis of spatially and temporally clustered seismicity, precise relocations, waveform‐based clustering, and moment tensor solutions for 67 earthquakes (1.13.3) help to characterize the heterogeneous study region in the south‐eastern Alps. We observe a strong zonation, with clustered microseismicity predominantly in the SE and NW parts of the study area. The identified sequences indicate a dominance of swarms in the NW compared to more mainshock‐aftershock sequences in the SE, while both sequence types can occur in both regions. We identify multiple short faults in the NW with lengths of a few hundred meters, and distinguish two close fault structures activated in one sequence based on waveform similarity and focal mechanisms. Compared to predominant thrust faulting in the SE, normal and strike‐slip faulting in the NW points to high regional complexity, with local stresses deviating from simple expectations of thrust faulting resulting from the Europe‐Adria convergence. We find that zones of increased microseismic activity match zones of high P wave attenuation from a recent Qp model developed in the AlpArray initiative (Jozi Najafabadi et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623‐023‐01942‐0 ), supporting our interpretations of spatiotemporal patterns concerning crustal properties and tectonic activity. Our findings agree well with the occurrence of large historical earthquakes while simultaneously shedding light on much smaller seismogenic features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030516
Citations
7
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microseismicity in the Large‐N Swath‐D Network: Revealing Seismic Sequences and Active Faults in the Eastern Alps

Simone Cesca, Rens Hofman, Gesa Petersen, J. Kummerow
7 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
earthquake and tectonic studies
13.06
article

Microseismicity in the Large‐N Swath‐D Network: Revealing Seismic Sequences and Active Faults in the Eastern Alps

Simone Cesca, Rens Hofman, Gesa Petersen, J. Kummerow
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Uniformly spaced large‐N seismic networks like the Swath‐D (2017–2019), a densified part of the AlpArray initiative, provide unmatched opportunities to study microseismic activity and fault structures. Here, we show how the combined analysis of spatially and temporally clustered seismicity, precise relocations, waveform‐based clustering, and moment tensor solutions for 67 earthquakes (1.13.3) help to characterize the heterogeneous study region in the south‐eastern Alps. We observe a strong zonation, with clustered microseismicity predominantly in the SE and NW parts of the study area. The identified sequences indicate a dominance of swarms in the NW compared to more mainshock‐aftershock sequences in the SE, while both sequence types can occur in both regions. We identify multiple short faults in the NW with lengths of a few hundred meters, and distinguish two close fault structures activated in one sequence based on waveform similarity and focal mechanisms. Compared to predominant thrust faulting in the SE, normal and strike‐slip faulting in the NW points to high regional complexity, with local stresses deviating from simple expectations of thrust faulting resulting from the Europe‐Adria convergence. We find that zones of increased microseismic activity match zones of high P wave attenuation from a recent Qp model developed in the AlpArray initiative (Jozi Najafabadi et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623‐023‐01942‐0 ), supporting our interpretations of spatiotemporal patterns concerning crustal properties and tectonic activity. Our findings agree well with the occurrence of large historical earthquakes while simultaneously shedding light on much smaller seismogenic features.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(2)
GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
earthquake and tectonic studies
13.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.