Research Note: A novel immunization approach for chicken coccidiosis vaccine: waterline immunization and its application effect

Coccidiosis is a prevalent disease in poultry industry, causing significant economic losses. Vaccine immunization has been developed as an effective method to prevent coccidiosis. In China, the traditional method for coccidiosis vaccination in the poultry industry involves the using water troughs and powder drinking water adjuvants for chick immunization via drinking. However, as the breeding industry evolves rapidly, water troughs are progressively being replaced by water lines. This article introduces an innovative immunization approach-waterline immunization-utilizing a novel microencapsulated drinking water adjuvant. The oocyst suspension effects of microencapsulated drinking adjuvants and powder drinking adjuvants was compared in water with Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) values ranging from 0 to 1000 ppm. The findings revealed that the microencapsulated drinking adjuvant could ensure stable suspension of oocysts in water with TDS values from 0 to 1000 ppm for 6 h. Experimental chickens were vaccinated with a coccidiosis trivalent live vaccines using four distinct immunization methods: spray immunization, powder water bottle immunization, microencapsulated waterline immunization, and feed mixing immunization. The effectiveness of these four immunization methods was assessed by comparing the tip staining rate and the average number of oocysts per chicken post-immunization. The results showed that the average number of oocysts per chicken, from 96 to 168 h post-immunization, decreased in the following order: microencapsulated waterline immunization, powder water bottle immunization, feed mixing immunization, and spray immunization. Waterline immunization is a convenient and efficient immunization approach, particularly suitable for large-scale poultry farms to achieve uniform flock immunization. It represents a promising new option for the prevention of coccidiosis in the breeding industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.104945
Primary Topic
Coccidia and coccidiosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Note: A novel immunization approach for chicken coccidiosis vaccine: waterline immunization and its application effect

Xinqiu Wang, Z Wang, Lidan Liu, Dax Fu et al.
Poultry Science
Coccidia and coccidiosis research
article

Research Note: A novel immunization approach for chicken coccidiosis vaccine: waterline immunization and its application effect

Xinqiu Wang, Z Wang, Lidan Liu, Dax Fu, Zhijian Tan, Yuan Liu, Wenli Wang, Rui-Qing Lin, Ya‐Biao Weng, Li Zeng
article en

Abstract

Coccidiosis is a prevalent disease in poultry industry, causing significant economic losses. Vaccine immunization has been developed as an effective method to prevent coccidiosis. In China, the traditional method for coccidiosis vaccination in the poultry industry involves the using water troughs and powder drinking water adjuvants for chick immunization via drinking. However, as the breeding industry evolves rapidly, water troughs are progressively being replaced by water lines. This article introduces an innovative immunization approach-waterline immunization-utilizing a novel microencapsulated drinking water adjuvant. The oocyst suspension effects of microencapsulated drinking adjuvants and powder drinking adjuvants was compared in water with Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) values ranging from 0 to 1000 ppm. The findings revealed that the microencapsulated drinking adjuvant could ensure stable suspension of oocysts in water with TDS values from 0 to 1000 ppm for 6 h. Experimental chickens were vaccinated with a coccidiosis trivalent live vaccines using four distinct immunization methods: spray immunization, powder water bottle immunization, microencapsulated waterline immunization, and feed mixing immunization. The effectiveness of these four immunization methods was assessed by comparing the tip staining rate and the average number of oocysts per chicken post-immunization. The results showed that the average number of oocysts per chicken, from 96 to 168 h post-immunization, decreased in the following order: microencapsulated waterline immunization, powder water bottle immunization, feed mixing immunization, and spray immunization. Waterline immunization is a convenient and efficient immunization approach, particularly suitable for large-scale poultry farms to achieve uniform flock immunization. It represents a promising new option for the prevention of coccidiosis in the breeding industry.

Poultry ScienceVol. 104(5)
South China Agricultural University (CN), Standard Bio (Norway) (NO)
Guangdong Science and Technology Department, Special Project for Research and Development in Key areas of Guangdong Province
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Coccidia and coccidiosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.