Endoscopic full-thickness resection <i>vs</i> surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching

This study is a non-inferiority design. The EFTR group significantly outperformed the SR group in terms of operative time, length of hospital stay, time to resume a liquid diet, incidence of adverse events, and hospitalization costs, demonstrating its higher economic efficiency and better tolerability. Additionally, although the <i>en bloc</i> resection rate was lower in the EFTR group compared to the SR group, there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence rates and progression-free survival between the two groups. This study found no statistical difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative recurrence rates between the two groups. However, due to sample size limitations, this result requires further validation in larger-scale studies. The current results should be viewed as exploratory evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching

Si-Qiao Zhao, Jintao Guo, Siyu Sun, Sheng Wang et al.
2 citations
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
3.62
article

Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching

Si-Qiao Zhao, Jintao Guo, Siyu Sun, Sheng Wang, Siyao Wang, Nan Ge, Lei Su, Xiang Liu, Guoxin Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study is a non-inferiority design. The EFTR group significantly outperformed the SR group in terms of operative time, length of hospital stay, time to resume a liquid diet, incidence of adverse events, and hospitalization costs, demonstrating its higher economic efficiency and better tolerability. Additionally, although the <i>en bloc</i> resection rate was lower in the EFTR group compared to the SR group, there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence rates and progression-free survival between the two groups. This study found no statistical difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative recurrence rates between the two groups. However, due to sample size limitations, this result requires further validation in larger-scale studies. The current results should be viewed as exploratory evidence.

World Journal of Gastrointestinal SurgeryVol. 17(3)
China Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
3.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.