Legal Implications of Surgical Malpractice: An Analytical Approach

A major issue in the medical industry, surgical fraud might cause lawsuits against organisations and personnel. The kind of analysis used in this work clarifies the legal consequences of medical misconduct. It examines the primary causes of surgical errors, including procedural errors, poor communication, and insufficient patient monitoring, including This paper examines case studies and past rulings to demonstrate how courts determine who is liable in surgical malpractice claims and the difficulties proving negligence or breach of duty. The research also examines how libel insurance supports the protection of those in the healthcare sector. The article also discusses how informed consent, patient rights, and how the legislation is evolving as recording is progressively becoming more and more crucial in reducing the possibility of litigation. The findings make it very evident that we need tougher legislation to handle medical fraud, more training, and better means of communication. According to the findings, healthcare professionals must be well-versed in both the medical and legal domains if they are to keep patients safe, lower risks, and guard themselves from any legal issues.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.1648
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Implications of Surgical Malpractice: An Analytical Approach

Iype Cherian, R Kulkarni, Umesh Chougule, Anjali Khare et al.
1 citations
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
article

Legal Implications of Surgical Malpractice: An Analytical Approach

Iype Cherian, R Kulkarni, Umesh Chougule, Anjali Khare, Santosh Kumar Soni, Lalita Kiran Wani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A major issue in the medical industry, surgical fraud might cause lawsuits against organisations and personnel. The kind of analysis used in this work clarifies the legal consequences of medical misconduct. It examines the primary causes of surgical errors, including procedural errors, poor communication, and insufficient patient monitoring, including This paper examines case studies and past rulings to demonstrate how courts determine who is liable in surgical malpractice claims and the difficulties proving negligence or breach of duty. The research also examines how libel insurance supports the protection of those in the healthcare sector. The article also discusses how informed consent, patient rights, and how the legislation is evolving as recording is progressively becoming more and more crucial in reducing the possibility of litigation. The findings make it very evident that we need tougher legislation to handle medical fraud, more training, and better means of communication. According to the findings, healthcare professionals must be well-versed in both the medical and legal domains if they are to keep patients safe, lower risks, and guard themselves from any legal issues.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(2S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal Implications of Surgical Malpractice: An Analytical Approach — Iype Cherian, R Kulkarni, et al. · Journal of Neonatal Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS