The influence of sex on activity in voluntary wheel running, forced treadmill running, and open field testing in mice

Physical activity is commonly used for both measuring and treating dysfunction. While preclinical work has been historically biased towards males, the inclusion of both males and females is gaining popularity. With the increasing inclusion of both sexes, it is imperative to determine sex differences in common behavioral assays. This was a secondary analysis of healthy naïve mice to determine baseline sex differences in three activity assays: voluntary wheel running (32 mice), forced treadmill running (178 mice), and open field (88 mice). In voluntary wheel running, females showed greater distance run, running time, bout duration, and speed, but no difference in total bouts. In forced treadmill running, females showed greater time to exhaustion, but no difference in maximum speed attained. In open field, males showed greater active time but no difference in distance and speed over 30 min; however, male mice showed a downward trajectory in distance and speed over the final 20 min of testing, whereas females did not. These data suggest that male mice demonstrate comparable activity intensity to female mice but do not match females' duration of activity, especially for volitional tasks. Researchers utilizing these assays should account for sex differences as they could mask true findings in an experiment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Reports
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70246
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of sex on activity in voluntary wheel running, forced treadmill running, and open field testing in mice

Ashley N. Plumb, Kazuhiro Hayashi, Christopher J. Benson, Adam J. Janowski et al.
3 citations
Physiological Reports
Behavioral Health and Interventions
4.63
article

The influence of sex on activity in voluntary wheel running, forced treadmill running, and open field testing in mice

Ashley N. Plumb, Kazuhiro Hayashi, Christopher J. Benson, Adam J. Janowski, Kathleen A. Sluka, Tahsin Khataei, Giovanni Berardi, Ben P. Martin, Joe B. Lesnak
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Physical activity is commonly used for both measuring and treating dysfunction. While preclinical work has been historically biased towards males, the inclusion of both males and females is gaining popularity. With the increasing inclusion of both sexes, it is imperative to determine sex differences in common behavioral assays. This was a secondary analysis of healthy naïve mice to determine baseline sex differences in three activity assays: voluntary wheel running (32 mice), forced treadmill running (178 mice), and open field (88 mice). In voluntary wheel running, females showed greater distance run, running time, bout duration, and speed, but no difference in total bouts. In forced treadmill running, females showed greater time to exhaustion, but no difference in maximum speed attained. In open field, males showed greater active time but no difference in distance and speed over 30 min; however, male mice showed a downward trajectory in distance and speed over the final 20 min of testing, whereas females did not. These data suggest that male mice demonstrate comparable activity intensity to female mice but do not match females' duration of activity, especially for volitional tasks. Researchers utilizing these assays should account for sex differences as they could mask true findings in an experiment.

Physiological ReportsVol. 13(4)
University of Iowa (US), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Kyoto University (JP), Iowa City VA Health Care System (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Foundation for Physical Therapy, National Institutes of Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.