A comparison between emergency physicians and radiologists on the interpretation of computed tomography in acute appendicitis

Background/Aim: Appendicitis is a common acute abdominal disease seen in the emergency department (ED). Early diagnosis of appendicitis can reduce time to treatment and prevent complications. In this study, we aimed to compare the interpretation of computer tomography (CT) scans between emergency physicians and radiologists. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that enrolled patients with CT scans for suspected acute appendicitis in an academic hospital from July 2019 to May 2020. Analysis of the accuracy of the diagnosis of appendicitis and time from completion of CT scan were compared between emergency physicians and radiologists. Results: A total of 318 patients with appendicitis were included. Patients arriving at the hospital during off-hours were younger (mean difference: 5, P=0.016) and more commonly had normal C-reactive protein (chi-square: 11.19, P<0.001). Neither group’s interpretation of appendicitis was affected by arrival time, and both groups performed differential diagnosis well (emergency physician area under curve [AUC]: 0.912 vs. radiologist AUC: 0.911). Time to CT interpretation by emergency physicians was significantly lower than by radiologists (mean difference: -217.37 min, P<0.001). Conclusions: The interpretation of abdominal CT scans for acute appendicitis by emergency physicians was more efficient and equally accurate compared to interpretation by radiologists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgery and Medicine
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.8013
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison between emergency physicians and radiologists on the interpretation of computed tomography in acute appendicitis

Enoch Kang, Peter C. Hou, Sheng‐Feng Lin, Tsung‐Hsi Wang et al.
Journal of Surgery and Medicine
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

A comparison between emergency physicians and radiologists on the interpretation of computed tomography in acute appendicitis

Enoch Kang, Peter C. Hou, Sheng‐Feng Lin, Tsung‐Hsi Wang, Chun‐Chieh Chao, Hui‐An Lin
article en

Abstract

Background/Aim: Appendicitis is a common acute abdominal disease seen in the emergency department (ED). Early diagnosis of appendicitis can reduce time to treatment and prevent complications. In this study, we aimed to compare the interpretation of computer tomography (CT) scans between emergency physicians and radiologists. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that enrolled patients with CT scans for suspected acute appendicitis in an academic hospital from July 2019 to May 2020. Analysis of the accuracy of the diagnosis of appendicitis and time from completion of CT scan were compared between emergency physicians and radiologists. Results: A total of 318 patients with appendicitis were included. Patients arriving at the hospital during off-hours were younger (mean difference: 5, P=0.016) and more commonly had normal C-reactive protein (chi-square: 11.19, P<0.001). Neither group’s interpretation of appendicitis was affected by arrival time, and both groups performed differential diagnosis well (emergency physician area under curve [AUC]: 0.912 vs. radiologist AUC: 0.911). Time to CT interpretation by emergency physicians was significantly lower than by radiologists (mean difference: -217.37 min, P<0.001). Conclusions: The interpretation of abdominal CT scans for acute appendicitis by emergency physicians was more efficient and equally accurate compared to interpretation by radiologists.

Journal of Surgery and MedicineVol. 9(2)
Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR), National Taiwan University (TW), Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.