Pan‐European Landslide Risk Assessment: From Theory to Practice

Abstract Assessing landslide risk is a fundamental requirement to plan suitable prevention actions. To date, most risk studies focus on individual slopes or catchments. Whereas regional, national or continental scale assessments are hardly available because of methodological and/or data limitations. In this contribution, we present an overview of all requirements and limitations in landslide risk studies across all spatial scales, by means of a hybrid form that combines elements of original research with the comprehensive characteristics of a review study. The review critically analyses each component in the landslide risk analysis providing a detailed explanation of their state‐of‐the‐art, with dedicated sections on susceptibility, hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. To put the theoretical framework to test, we also dive into a case study, expressed at the continental scale. Specifically, we take the main European mountain ranges and provide the reader with a textbook example of risk assessment for such a large territory. In doing so, we take into account issues associated with cross‐national differences in landslide mapping. As a result, we identify landslide‐prone European landscape and explore the associated possible economic consequences (human settlements and agricultural areas). We also analyze the population at risk during daytime and nighttime. Moreover, a modern view of the problem is explored in the form of how risk outcomes should be delivered to master planners and geoscientific personnel alike. Specifically, we convert our output into an interactive Web Application ( https://pan‐european‐landslide‐risk.github.io/ ) to include notions of scientific communication both to a large public as well as to a technical audience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023rg000825
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
43.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pan‐European Landslide Risk Assessment: From Theory to Practice

Veronica Tofani, Marco Loche, Nicola Casagli, Constantinos Nefros et al.
18 citations
Reviews of Geophysics
Landslides and related hazards
43.60
article

Pan‐European Landslide Risk Assessment: From Theory to Practice

Veronica Tofani, Marco Loche, Nicola Casagli, Constantinos Nefros, Mateja Jemec‐Auflič, Federico Raspini, Vincent Drouin, Francesco Caleca, Hakan Tanyaş, Marj Tonini, Alessandro Novellino, Luigi Lombardo, Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint, Ashok Dahal, Stefan Steger
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract Assessing landslide risk is a fundamental requirement to plan suitable prevention actions. To date, most risk studies focus on individual slopes or catchments. Whereas regional, national or continental scale assessments are hardly available because of methodological and/or data limitations. In this contribution, we present an overview of all requirements and limitations in landslide risk studies across all spatial scales, by means of a hybrid form that combines elements of original research with the comprehensive characteristics of a review study. The review critically analyses each component in the landslide risk analysis providing a detailed explanation of their state‐of‐the‐art, with dedicated sections on susceptibility, hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. To put the theoretical framework to test, we also dive into a case study, expressed at the continental scale. Specifically, we take the main European mountain ranges and provide the reader with a textbook example of risk assessment for such a large territory. In doing so, we take into account issues associated with cross‐national differences in landslide mapping. As a result, we identify landslide‐prone European landscape and explore the associated possible economic consequences (human settlements and agricultural areas). We also analyze the population at risk during daytime and nighttime. Moreover, a modern view of the problem is explored in the form of how risk outcomes should be delivered to master planners and geoscientific personnel alike. Specifically, we convert our output into an interactive Web Application ( https://pan‐european‐landslide‐risk.github.io/ ) to include notions of scientific communication both to a large public as well as to a technical audience.

Reviews of GeophysicsVol. 63(1)
Geological Survey of Slovenia (SI), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), British Geological Survey (GB), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ), Charles University (CZ), National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics (IT), University of Florence (IT), University of Twente (NL), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Landslides and related hazards
43.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.