From Big Farms to Big Pharma? Problematizing science-related populism

Skepticism about health/vaccination policies during Covid-19 was considered a key example of "science-related populism" mainly based on far-right case studies. However, criticism also spread among various left-wing and environmentalist milieus, which represents an understudied phenomenon. Relying on different strands of scientific literature, and on a qualitative research design aimed both to take account of the political heterogeneity within this critical area and to deepen its links with environmentalism, we aim to highlight the limits and normative implications of its interpretation as solely populism, and to contribute to the elaboration of a different interpretive model. Qualitative and frame-bridging analysis highlighted the consolidation of worldviews in clear opposition to hegemonic values, where the criticism of science finds a more appropriate explanation in a denunciation of the intrusiveness of capitalism in science production, as well as in a rejection of "reductionism" and a claim to self-determination that extend from ecological to health issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251316727
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Big Farms to Big Pharma? Problematizing science-related populism

Niccolò Bertuzzi, Elisa Lello
6 citations
Public Understanding of Science
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
8.59
article

From Big Farms to Big Pharma? Problematizing science-related populism

Niccolò Bertuzzi, Elisa Lello
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Skepticism about health/vaccination policies during Covid-19 was considered a key example of "science-related populism" mainly based on far-right case studies. However, criticism also spread among various left-wing and environmentalist milieus, which represents an understudied phenomenon. Relying on different strands of scientific literature, and on a qualitative research design aimed both to take account of the political heterogeneity within this critical area and to deepen its links with environmentalism, we aim to highlight the limits and normative implications of its interpretation as solely populism, and to contribute to the elaboration of a different interpretive model. Qualitative and frame-bridging analysis highlighted the consolidation of worldviews in clear opposition to hegemonic values, where the criticism of science finds a more appropriate explanation in a denunciation of the intrusiveness of capitalism in science production, as well as in a rejection of "reductionism" and a claim to self-determination that extend from ecological to health issues.

Public Understanding of ScienceVol. 34(4)
University of Parma (IT), University of Urbino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
8.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Big Farms to Big Pharma? Problematizing science-related populism — Niccolò Bertuzzi, Elisa Lello · Public Understanding of Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS