Outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with the MatOrtho prosthesis after a minimum of 10 years

This is a prospective case review on 100 MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasties in 50 patients with previously published 2-year outcomes. We report the outcomes at a minimum of 10-years' follow-up. Sixty-three implants in 29 patients were available for analysis. The visual analogue scale score for pain revealed a significant improvement of pain at 10 years (mean 0.7, SD 1.3) compared with preoperatively (mean 4.3, SD 0.8) and at 2 years (mean 1.1, SD 1.8). There was no statistically significant improvement at 10 years compared with preoperatively in the mean grip strength (10, SD 6.7), range of motion (27°, SD 20.1,), patient evaluation measure score (43, SD 22), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (38, SD 23) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (65, SD 9,), but all patients remained satisfied with the surgery. Survivorship was 82% at 10 years. We conclude that this implant is suitable to use mainly for pain relief.<b>Level of Evidence:</b> IV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251313996
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with the MatOrtho prosthesis after a minimum of 10 years

Matthew Ricks, Sumedh Talwalkar, Ian Trail, Katy Boland et al.
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with the MatOrtho prosthesis after a minimum of 10 years

Matthew Ricks, Sumedh Talwalkar, Ian Trail, Katy Boland, Kohila Vani Sigamoney, David Shields, Elizabeth Gillott
article en

Abstract

This is a prospective case review on 100 MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasties in 50 patients with previously published 2-year outcomes. We report the outcomes at a minimum of 10-years' follow-up. Sixty-three implants in 29 patients were available for analysis. The visual analogue scale score for pain revealed a significant improvement of pain at 10 years (mean 0.7, SD 1.3) compared with preoperatively (mean 4.3, SD 0.8) and at 2 years (mean 1.1, SD 1.8). There was no statistically significant improvement at 10 years compared with preoperatively in the mean grip strength (10, SD 6.7), range of motion (27°, SD 20.1,), patient evaluation measure score (43, SD 22), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (38, SD 23) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (65, SD 9,), but all patients remained satisfied with the surgery. Survivorship was 82% at 10 years. We conclude that this implant is suitable to use mainly for pain relief.<b>Level of Evidence:</b> IV.

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)Vol. 50(8)
Wrightington Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.