Food waste, date labels, and risk preferences: An experimental exploration

Abstract This study provides theoretical and experimental evidence that consumers adjust their premeditated food waste by date labels and their risk and loss preferences. The “Use by” date label leads to more premeditated food waste than “Best by” for deli meat and spaghetti sauce. However, changing date labels may not lower premeditated food waste relative to no label at all. Greater loss aversion correlates with higher premeditated food waste regardless of date labels and products. For participants with high loss aversion, they have higher premediated waste with no statistical difference in response for “Best by” and “Use by” labels. These results highlight the heterogeneous response to date labels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13507
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food waste, date labels, and risk preferences: An experimental exploration

Ruiqing Miao, Norbert Wilson
6 citations
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
6.97
article

Food waste, date labels, and risk preferences: An experimental exploration

Ruiqing Miao, Norbert Wilson
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study provides theoretical and experimental evidence that consumers adjust their premeditated food waste by date labels and their risk and loss preferences. The “Use by” date label leads to more premeditated food waste than “Best by” for deli meat and spaghetti sauce. However, changing date labels may not lower premeditated food waste relative to no label at all. Greater loss aversion correlates with higher premeditated food waste regardless of date labels and products. For participants with high loss aversion, they have higher premediated waste with no statistical difference in response for “Best by” and “Use by” labels. These results highlight the heterogeneous response to date labels.

Applied Economic Perspectives and PolicyVol. 47(3)
Duke University (US), Auburn University (US), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
6.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.