Janitizer: Rethinking Binary Tools for Practical and Comprehensive Security

Comprehensive application security can only be ensured if all code that it is going to execute is protected: any unprotected code, either from libraries or the application, becomes a potential attack surface. Compilers contain extensive suites of tools to aid in this, but require source availability that is often infeasible. Existing static and dynamic binary rewriting techniques that retrofit for security either lack in code coverage or soundness, or incur very high performance overhead. We present a case for adopting hybrid static-dynamic mechanisms to ensure comprehensive security for binaries, providing sound and practical solutions. We highlight the limitations of existing hybrid tools in their use for security purposes, and provide insights to re-architect them. We provide a framework, Janitizer, that enables sound and comprehensive code coverage for entire applications, presenting hybrid binary implementations for two important classes of security schemes; a memory sanitizer and a control flow integrity scheme. These achieve the coverage and correctness of high-overhead dynamic techniques, while maintaining performance levels of low-coverage static techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696443.3708930
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Janitizer: Rethinking Binary Tools for Practical and Comprehensive Security

Sam Ainsworth, Timothy M. Jones, Mahwish Arif
Security and Verification in Computing
article

Janitizer: Rethinking Binary Tools for Practical and Comprehensive Security

Sam Ainsworth, Timothy M. Jones, Mahwish Arif
article en

Abstract

Comprehensive application security can only be ensured if all code that it is going to execute is protected: any unprotected code, either from libraries or the application, becomes a potential attack surface. Compilers contain extensive suites of tools to aid in this, but require source availability that is often infeasible. Existing static and dynamic binary rewriting techniques that retrofit for security either lack in code coverage or soundness, or incur very high performance overhead. We present a case for adopting hybrid static-dynamic mechanisms to ensure comprehensive security for binaries, providing sound and practical solutions. We highlight the limitations of existing hybrid tools in their use for security purposes, and provide insights to re-architect them. We provide a framework, Janitizer, that enables sound and comprehensive code coverage for entire applications, presenting hybrid binary implementations for two important classes of security schemes; a memory sanitizer and a control flow integrity scheme. These achieve the coverage and correctness of high-overhead dynamic techniques, while maintaining performance levels of low-coverage static techniques.

University of Cambridge (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.