Cytotoxicity of chitosan gelatin limestone-based carbonate hydroxyapatite composite scaffold after crosslinking

Background: The development of biomaterial scaffolds is used as one of the solutions for dealing with bone damage. The combination of materials in scaffolds before being applied to clinical practice therefore required several stages for testing the biocompatibility material. One of the material biocompatibility tests involves a cytotoxicity test on osteoblast 7F2 cells. Purpose: To demonstrates the percentage of viable cells for Chitosan-Gelatin:Carbonate HydroxyApatite (C G:CHA) scaffold with a ratio of 20:80, 30:70, and 40:60 (w:w) after crosslinking with 0.25% glutaraldehyde on 7F2 osteoblasts. Methods: MTT assay is a cytotoxicity test used in this research. The research data are analyzed by comparative tests using Shapiro-Wilk, Levene, and One-Way Anova test, post hoc Games-Howell. Results: Statistical tests from the percentage of live cells shows that between the control cell group and the C-G:CHA 20:80 crosslink group, the cell group and the C-G:CHA 20:80 group without crosslink, the C G:CHA group 20:80 crosslink and C-G:CHA group 30:70 without crosslink, C-G:CHA group 20:80 without crosslink and C-G:CHA group 30:70 without crosslink, there are significant differences. Conclusion: Scaffold C-G:CHA with a ratio of 20:80, 30:70, and 40:60 (w:w) after crosslinked with 0.25% glutaraldehyde was found not toxicity to osteoblast cells 7F2 because indirectly cytotoxicity test resulted a percentage of live cells of >50%.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.2.3557
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cytotoxicity of chitosan gelatin limestone-based carbonate hydroxyapatite composite scaffold after crosslinking

Devi Rianti, Anita Yuliati, Priyawan Rachmadi, Maryama Aflaha et al.
1 citations
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.67
article

Cytotoxicity of chitosan gelatin limestone-based carbonate hydroxyapatite composite scaffold after crosslinking

Devi Rianti, Anita Yuliati, Priyawan Rachmadi, Maryama Aflaha, Rahma Maulidya, Fayza Aldinafitri Anggraini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The development of biomaterial scaffolds is used as one of the solutions for dealing with bone damage. The combination of materials in scaffolds before being applied to clinical practice therefore required several stages for testing the biocompatibility material. One of the material biocompatibility tests involves a cytotoxicity test on osteoblast 7F2 cells. Purpose: To demonstrates the percentage of viable cells for Chitosan-Gelatin:Carbonate HydroxyApatite (C G:CHA) scaffold with a ratio of 20:80, 30:70, and 40:60 (w:w) after crosslinking with 0.25% glutaraldehyde on 7F2 osteoblasts. Methods: MTT assay is a cytotoxicity test used in this research. The research data are analyzed by comparative tests using Shapiro-Wilk, Levene, and One-Way Anova test, post hoc Games-Howell. Results: Statistical tests from the percentage of live cells shows that between the control cell group and the C-G:CHA 20:80 crosslink group, the cell group and the C-G:CHA 20:80 group without crosslink, the C G:CHA group 20:80 crosslink and C-G:CHA group 30:70 without crosslink, C-G:CHA group 20:80 without crosslink and C-G:CHA group 30:70 without crosslink, there are significant differences. Conclusion: Scaffold C-G:CHA with a ratio of 20:80, 30:70, and 40:60 (w:w) after crosslinked with 0.25% glutaraldehyde was found not toxicity to osteoblast cells 7F2 because indirectly cytotoxicity test resulted a percentage of live cells of >50%.

World Journal of Advanced Research and ReviewsVol. 25(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.