Comparative Efficiency Analysis of OECD Health Systems: FDH vs. Machine Learning Approaches with Efficiency Analysis Trees (EAT and RFEAT)

Traditional methods like FDH are prone to inefficiency underestimation, especially in small samples with multiple variables. This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning approaches like EAT and RFEAT to provide more reliable efficiency estimates. These methods can help policymakers make better resource allocation decisions by mitigating inefficiency underestimation and offering greater discrimination power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00607-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficiency Analysis of OECD Health Systems: FDH vs. Machine Learning Approaches with Efficiency Analysis Trees (EAT and RFEAT)

Yejin Joo
2 citations
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
article

Comparative Efficiency Analysis of OECD Health Systems: FDH vs. Machine Learning Approaches with Efficiency Analysis Trees (EAT and RFEAT)

Yejin Joo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Traditional methods like FDH are prone to inefficiency underestimation, especially in small samples with multiple variables. This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning approaches like EAT and RFEAT to provide more reliable efficiency estimates. These methods can help policymakers make better resource allocation decisions by mitigating inefficiency underestimation and offering greater discrimination power.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource AllocationVol. 23(1)
Seoul National University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.