Benefits of aggressively co-undergrounding electric and broadband lines outweigh costs

Electric power and broadband have become essential services for modern economies, but utilities face substantial challenges in providing disruption-free access. Recent legislation, including the U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, has allocated enormous resources towards improving infrastructure systems. Historically, undergrounding has enhanced system reliability but has been cost-effective only in densely populated areas. We investigate the conditions under which undergrounding becomes cost-effective, particularly when co-deployed with fiber optic lines. We introduce a novel data-driven cost–benefit model and conduct a detailed localized case study in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts. The results indicate that when undergrounding is viable, aggressively co-undergrounding yields the highest net benefit. This finding is robust across various assumptions. Importantly, our model highlights the importance of assumptions regarding undergrounding’s effectiveness in reducing outages. Our model is readily deployable to other study areas, providing effective decision-making capabilities even with limited data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Sustainability
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100334
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefits of aggressively co-undergrounding electric and broadband lines outweigh costs

Mahsa Arabi, Anna Goldstein, Jimi Oke, Erin Baker et al.
Cell Reports Sustainability
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Benefits of aggressively co-undergrounding electric and broadband lines outweigh costs

Mahsa Arabi, Anna Goldstein, Jimi Oke, Erin Baker, Alexander Apostolov, Jay Taneja, Abhiraksha Pattabhiraman, Michael Bloomberg
article en

Abstract

Electric power and broadband have become essential services for modern economies, but utilities face substantial challenges in providing disruption-free access. Recent legislation, including the U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, has allocated enormous resources towards improving infrastructure systems. Historically, undergrounding has enhanced system reliability but has been cost-effective only in densely populated areas. We investigate the conditions under which undergrounding becomes cost-effective, particularly when co-deployed with fiber optic lines. We introduce a novel data-driven cost–benefit model and conduct a detailed localized case study in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts. The results indicate that when undergrounding is viable, aggressively co-undergrounding yields the highest net benefit. This finding is robust across various assumptions. Importantly, our model highlights the importance of assumptions regarding undergrounding’s effectiveness in reducing outages. Our model is readily deployable to other study areas, providing effective decision-making capabilities even with limited data.

Cell Reports SustainabilityVol. 2(3)
Amherst College (US), Cornell University (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Fidelity Biosciences (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.